Haryana

StateCommission

CC/527/2017

PAWAN KUMAR HOODA - Complainant(s)

Versus

PURI CONSTRUCTION LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

S.C.SINGHAL

27 Sep 2022

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/527/2017
( Date of Filing : 31 Aug 2017 )
 
1. PAWAN KUMAR HOODA
R/O C-1/433 PALAM VIHAR, GURGAON.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. PURI CONSTRUCTION LTD.
PRATHAM PROJECT SECTOR 84, FARIDABAD.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  S . P . Sood PRESIDING MEMBER
  Suresh Chander Kaushik MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 27 Sep 2022
Final Order / Judgement

 

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

HARYANA PANCHKULA

 

                                              Date of the Institution: 31.08.2017

                                                Date of final hearing: 27.09.2022

                                                         Date of Pronouncement:27.09.2022   

 

 

Consumer Complaint No.527 of 2017

 

IN THE MATTER OF

 

Shri Pawan Kumar Hooda, S/o Shri Chander Singh, R/o C-1/433, Palam Vihar, Gurgaon, Haryana.                                                                                                                                                                                                                   .….Complainant

Through Counsel, Mr. Govind Chauhan, Advocate

 

Versus

1.      M/s Puri Constructions Pvt. Ltd. through its Authorized Signatory/Incharge, Pratham Project, Sector-84, Faridabad, Haryana.

2.      M/s Puri Constructions, Pvt. Ltd. Registered office at Nature Ville, W-82-A, Greater Kailash-II, New Delhi-110001.

                                                                                      .….Opposite parties

Through Counsel, Mr. B.S. Mittal, Advocate

 

CORAM:      Mr.S.P. Sood, Judicial Member.

                   Mr. Suresh Chander Kaushik, Member.

 

Present:-     Mr. Govind Chauhan, Advocate for Mr. Gaurav Gupta, counsel for the complainant.

                   Mr. B.S. Mittal, counsel for opposite party

 

                  

                    

                                      O R D E R

 

S.P. SOOD, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

 

 

                   Mr. Govind Chauhan, Advocate for Mr. Gaurav Gupta, counsel for the complainant has suffered a statement that he may be permitted to withdraw the present complaint as the matter has been amicably settled between the parties as per settlement and counsel for the respondent is not disputing the settlement. His statement in this regard recorded separately.

2.                In pursuance of respective statement made by Mr. Govind Chauhan, counsel for the complainant the present complaint stands dismissed as withdrawn.

3.                A copy of this order be provided to all the parties free of cost as mandated by the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. This order be uploaded forthwith on the website of the Commission for the perusal of the parties.

4.                File be consigned to record room alongwith a copy of this order.

 

 

 

 

September, 27th, 2022               S.C. Kaushik                                  S.P. Sood                                                                      Member                                              Judicial Member

                                                   Addl. Bench                                    Addl. Bench  

J.Y.

 

 

 

Pronounced on 27.09.2022

 

 

 
 
[ S . P . Sood]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[ Suresh Chander Kaushik]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.