Kerala

Trissur

CC/08/794

Sathyanarayanan - Complainant(s)

Versus

Punyabhoomi sanathana National Daily - Opp.Party(s)

Adv.K.Balakrishna Menon,k.Sunil Kumar

31 Dec 2009

ORDER


CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
Ayyanthole , Thrissur
consumer case(CC) No. CC/08/794

Sathyanarayanan
...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

Punyabhoomi sanathana National Daily
...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:
1. Padmini Sudheesh 2. Rajani P.S. 3. Sasidharan M.S

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):
1. Sathyanarayanan

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
1. Punyabhoomi sanathana National Daily

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
1. Adv.K.Balakrishna Menon,k.Sunil Kumar

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

 

 
By Smt. Padmini Sudheesh, President
 
           The complaint is filed to get back the amount deposited in the respondent firm. The case is as follows:
The complainant has deposited Rs.1,00,000/- on 9/5/2002 vide loan certificate No.23 and 24. It was assured that the amount will be returned with 11% interest when requested. But the amount has not been returned so far. Mean while the respondent firm was closed due to improper functioning and misappropriation of money by the respondents. And the deposit amounts have not been returned. Hence the complaint.
 
           2. The respondent has filed a counter affidavit denying all the averments in the complaint. He has stated there in that no deposit has been received by him and he is not liable to return Rs.1,00,000/- with interest.
 
           3. The complainant has filed proof affidavit and produced the loan certificate and receipt to prove his case. They are marked as Exhibit P1 to P3. No evidence adduced by respondent.
 
           4. The definite case of the complainant is that he has deposited Rs.1,00,000/- as per the loan certificate No.23 and 24 on 9/5/2002. He has given a receipt for this deposit. It was promised that these deposited amount will be refunded with 11% interest when demanded. So he is liable to get back Rs.1,00,000/- with 11% interest. Hence the complainant is liable to get back the amount deposited.
 
            5. In the result the complaint is allowed and the respondent is directed to return Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) to the complainant with interest at the rate of 11% from the date of deposit till realization with cost Rs.500/-(Rupees Five hundred only) within 2 months.
 

             Dictated to the Confdl. Asst., transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the open Forum this the 31st day of December 2009.




......................Padmini Sudheesh
......................Rajani P.S.
......................Sasidharan M.S