Kerala

Trissur

CC/06/894

Aji.K.G. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Punnyabhoomi Sanathana National Daily TVM - Opp.Party(s)

K. Balakrishna Menon

30 Dec 2009

ORDER


CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
Ayyanthole , Thrissur
consumer case(CC) No. CC/06/894

Aji.K.G.
K. Indira
...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

Punnyabhoomi Sanathana National Daily TVM
Accounts Manager
...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:
1. Padmini Sudheesh 2. Rajani P.S. 3. Sasidharan M.S

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):
1. Aji.K.G. 2. K. Indira

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
1. Punnyabhoomi Sanathana National Daily TVM 2. Accounts Manager

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
1. K. Balakrishna Menon

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

 
 
By Smt. Padmini Sudheesh, President:
 
            The first complainant is the son and the 2nd complainant is the mother of first complainant. They have deposited Rs.1,50,000/- with the respondent trust by receipt Nos.1367 and 1381. The first complainant deposited Rs.1,15,000/- and 2nd complainant deposited Rs.35,000/- and the total amount deposited is Rs.1,50,000/-. At the time of deposit it was assured that the respondent will return the amount at any time on request with interest at the rate of 12%. Subsequently the respondent trust was closed and the amount was not returned. Hence the complaint.
 
            2. The first respondent is called absent and set exparte. A statement filed by the complainant to the effect that no relief is sought against the 2nd respondent.
 
            3. The complainants filed affidavit and two documents to prove their case. The documents are marked as Exts. P1 and P2.
            4. According to the complainants, the amount deposited by them with the respondent trust is not returned so far even if the trust was closed. The deposits were made on 31.1.2000 and 15.2.2000. There is no maturity date stated in the Exts. P1 and P2 receipts. It is stated in the complaint that they have obtained interest on 15.12.2002 and 15.11.2004 of Rs.2000/-. The principal amount and balance interest not received so far. So this complaint is filed to get back the amount. There is no evidence to the contrary.
            5. In the result, the complaint is allowed and the first respondent is directed to return the Exts. P1 and P2 amount with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of deposit till realization with costs Rs.500/- (Rupees five hundred only) within two months. The interest amount accepted by the complainants is to be reduced from the above amount.
 

             Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the open Forum, this the 30th day of December 2009.




......................Padmini Sudheesh
......................Rajani P.S.
......................Sasidharan M.S