Haryana

Panchkula

CC/126/2016

AMIT KUMAR. - Complainant(s)

Versus

PUNNET ENTERPRISES. - Opp.Party(s)

PAWAN KHANNA.

26 May 2016

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA.                      

                                               

Complaint Case No.	:	126 of 2016
Date of Institution	:	24.05.2016
Date of Decision	:	26.05.2016

 

Amit Kumar, aged 47 years, S/o Sh.Kali Charan, C/o 624, Main Bazar, Kalka, Tehsil Kalka, District Panchkula.

 

                                                                                                                                          ….Complainant

Versus

Puneet Enterprises, through its Proprietor/authorized representative, Shop No.70, Sector 16-D, Chandigarh.

                        ….Opposite Parties

 

COMPLAINT UNDER SEC. 12 OF THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986.

Before:                       Mr.Dharam Pal, President.

      Mrs.Anita Kapoor, Member.

      Mr.S.P.Attri, Member.

 

Present:       Mr.Pawan Khanna, Adv., for the complainant.

 

                       

                                    Today the case was fixed for consideration on the admissibility of the complaint. At this stage, counsel for the complainant has made a separate statement in which he states that he wants to withdraw his present complaint with liberty to file afresh before the appropriate authority.

                        Heard. In view of the statement, the present complaint is hereby dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh before the appropriate authority. We order accordingly.

                        A copy of this order be sent to the complainant free of costs and file be consigned to record room after due compliance.

 

 

Dt.26.05.2016             (S.P.Attri)         (Anita Kapoor)       (Dharam Pal)

                                   Member                       Member                           President