Punjab

Mansa

CC/20/64

Santosh Kumari - Complainant(s)

Versus

Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authroity - Opp.Party(s)

Sh Deepak Kansal

29 Nov 2021

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MANSA
PUNJAB
 
Complaint Case No. CC/20/64
( Date of Filing : 09 Sep 2020 )
 
1. Santosh Kumari
W/o Satish Kumar Goyal R/o House No. 217, Ward No. 03, Kabir Colony Budhlada Tehsil Budhlada
Mansa
Punjab
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authroity
(Now BDA) PUDA Complx, Bhagu Road, Bathinda through its Esate officer
Bathinda
Punjab
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  R.L.MITTAL PRESIDENT
  Suraj Goyal MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Sh Deepak Kansal, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 Sh Narinder Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
Dated : 29 Nov 2021
Final Order / Judgement

For order see complaint No. 19 of 2020 titled as Narain Dass Versus PUDA.

 
 
[ R.L.MITTAL]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Suraj Goyal]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.