1 Heard. The contentions of the JD is that DH deposited Rs.3640/- under interim order passed by this Forum and the same have been adjusted in the future bill issued by the JD.

2 Learned Counsel for the DH also halfheartedly admitted at the bar that amount appears to have been adjusted as per statement filed by the JD/opposite party and order may be passed accordingly.

3 The history of the case is that complainant received bill for Rs.10,910/- and complainant challenged the bill being excessive and filed the application for passing interim order on which the then Learned Forum ordered the complainant to pay 1/3 rd of the disputed amount of the bill and complainant deposited amount of Rs.3640/- under that order, Vide order dated 3.5.2011, it was held that complainant would be entitled to refund of the amount, if already deposited by him alongwith interest of 9% per annum and now

-2-

complainant has filed application U/s 25 & 27 of the CPA for compliance of the order i.e. for recovery of Rs.3640/-.

4 The contentions of the JD is that they have adjusted the amount of Rs.3640/- in the subsequent bills. Learned counsel for the JD filed Statement of Account on the last date of hearing showing that amount of Rs.3640/- has been adjusted in October 2009.

5 Learned Counsel for the DH also not opposed the statement and as such, JDs have complied with order as the amount deposited by the complainant/DH have been adjusted in the subsequent bill much before the order dated 3.5.2011.

6 In view of above discussion, amount of Rs.3640/- deposited by the complainant/applicant already stands adjusted by the Ops/JDs and as such filed be consigned to the records as satisfied. Copy of this order be supplied to the parties free of costs as per law.