NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/378/2006

M/S GURMEET AND CO. - Complainant(s)

Versus

PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ANR. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. P.N.PURI

21 Apr 2010

ORDER

Date of Filing: 13 Feb 2006

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/378/2006
(Against the Order dated 16/08/2005 in Appeal No. 659/2000 of the State Commission Punjab)
1. M/S GURMEET AND CO.NEAR BUS STAND BUCHO MANDI TEH & DISTT. BHATINDA - ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ANR.PATILA - - ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN ,PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. S.K. NAIK ,MEMBER
For the Appellant :Mr.Dhiraj, Advocate for MR. P.N.PURI, Advocate
For the Respondent :Mr.Rajnish Kumar Singh, Advocate for -, Advocate

Dated : 21 Apr 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

          Counsel for the respondent states that the order of the State Commission has been complied with.  Counsel for the petitioner states that he has no instructions to that effect.

 

          Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

 

          In case the counsel for the petitioner receives instructions to the contrary, then the petitioner would be at liberty to move an application for reopening of the Revision Petition within 30 days.

 



......................JASHOK BHANPRESIDENT
......................S.K. NAIKMEMBER