Circuit Bench Asansol

StateCommission

CC/3/2022

Pradip Kumar Dhibar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Punjab National Bank & Others - Opp.Party(s)

Shankari Prasad Mukherjee

24 Aug 2022

ORDER

ASANSOL CIRCUIT BENCH
of
WEST BENGAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KSTP COMMUNITY HALL , DAKSHIN DHADKA
ASANSOL, PASCHIM BURDWAN - 713302
 
Complaint Case No. CC/3/2022
( Date of Filing : 25 Jul 2022 )
 
1. Pradip Kumar Dhibar
S/O Ajit Dhibar,Chalbalpur,Bidhanbag , J.K. Nagar , PIN 713337, West Bengal
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Punjab National Bank & Others
Represented through Chief Manager, Circle Sastra, Galeria Market,Nachan road , Benachity, Durgapur- 713213
2. Rukumina Devi
W/O Krishna Prasad,Krishna House, 86, West Apcargarden, P.O. Asansol, Dist. Paschim Bardhaman, Pin 713304, West Bengal
3. Krishna Prasad
S/O Late Bireshwar Shaw, Krishna House, 86, West Apcargarden, P.O. Asansol, Dist. Paschim Bardhaman, Pin 713304, West Bengal
4. Rajesh Prasad
S/O Krishna Prasad, Krishna House, 86, West Apcargarden, P.O. Asansol, Dist. Paschim Bardhaman, PIN 713304, West Bengal
5. Minor Shaurya Prasad
S/O Sri Satrughan Prasad, Krishna House, 86, West Apcargarden, P.O. Asansol, Dist. Paschim Bardhaman, PIN 713304, West Bengal
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. KAMAL DE PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. NITYASUNDAR TRIVEDI MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Shankari Prasad Mukherjee, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
NONE
......for the Opp. Party
Dated : 24 Aug 2022
Final Order / Judgement

HON’BLR MR. KAMAL DE, PRESIDING MEMBER

Order No. : 02
Date : 24.08.2022

Complainant is present through Ld. Lawyer.

The case is taken up for admission hearing.

Heard Ld. Lawyer for the complainant. Considered.

It appears that the property involved in this case is auction sale/purchase.

The complainant alleges that the officials of Punjab National Bank (OP) suppressed all materials facts and persuaded him to take part in the auction sale and the complainant deposited the security money 10 % of the reserve price so fixed by the bank for sale of the property on auction sale. The complainant as we find is the bidder in the said auction sale and deposited a sum of Rs. 13,70,000/-  being 25% of the reserved price. Moreover, we find that other litigations have been pending in Civil Courts at Asansol and in the State of Bihar and in D.R.D. Kolkata and in D.R.A.T. Kolkata involving the subject matter of the auction property. Auction sale/purchase is not attracted under C.P. Act, 2019. Moreover, complicated questions of law and fact are involved in the instant case and which cannot be determined without taking exhaustive evidences and which is not possible in summary trial under C.P. Act.

It is also alleged that the Bank has forfitted a sum of Rs. 13,70,000/- so deposited by the complainant relying upon protection under the SARFAESI Act.

This Commission has jurisdiction to intervene the Act of Bank under recourse to SARFAESI Act.

We are afraid the instant case is not maintainable either in fact or in law in C.P. Act, 2019.

The case as such is not admitted.

Hence,

                                    ORDERED

That the instant case be and the same is dismissed being not maintainable in C.P. Act, 2019.

The instant case is thus disposed off accordingly. 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. KAMAL DE]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NITYASUNDAR TRIVEDI]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.