Present: Complainant in person.

Sh. Paras Aggarwal counsel for OP.

OP counsel submits that an application under order 9 rule 13 r/w 151 another application under order 8 rule 1 r/w 151 CPC and  another application filed on limitation by OP. No reply filed by complainant.

We have heard counsel for OP and perused the record.

Admittedly OP was served on 23.01.2023 and one Sh. Saurav Kumar on behalf of OP bank appeared on 18.04.2024 at 1.20 pm after the ex parte order already passed. At the outset this commission has no powers under CPC of order 9 rule 13 and order 8 rule 1 CPC. For argument sake order 9 rule 13 is not maintainable as no ex parte decree has passed. The law is well settled by Hon’ble Apex Court in case title M/s Daddys Builder Vs. Manisha Bhargava & Ors. Dated 11.02.2021 . No application moved on behalf of OP thereby informing the commission that complete documents are not supplied.

In view of above reasons all three applications stands  dismissed.

Put up for complainant evidence on 24.12.2024

(SANJAY KUMAR)              (NIPUR CHANDNA)                      (RAJESH)

PRESIDENT                                    MEMBER                              MEMBER