Chandigarh

StateCommission

CC/258/2015

Vikas Yadav - Complainant(s)

Versus

Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Gagan Anand, Parveen Moudgil, Varsha Rana, Adv.

26 Apr 2016

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

U.T., CHANDIGARH
 

Consumer Complaint	:	258 of 2015
Date of Institution	:	02.11.2015
Date of Decision	:	26.04.2016

 

Vikas Yadav son of Sh. Padam Kant, Resident of A-24, Officers Mess, 12 wing, Air Force Station, Chandigarh.

……Complainant.

Versus

1. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd., SCO No.6-8, 1^st & 2^nd Floor, Sector 9-D, Chandigarh – 160 009.
2. Ms. Sunaina Minhas, Authorised Signatory, Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd., SCO No.6-8, 1^st & 2^nd Floor, Sector 9-D, Chandigarh – 160 009.

….Opposite Parties.

 

Complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

 

BEFORE:    JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH (RETD.), PRESIDENT.

                    SH. DEV RAJ, MEMBER.

                    MRS. PADMA PANDEY, MEMBER.

                  

Argued by:

 

Sh. D. S. Bainola, Advocate proxy for Sh. Parveen Moudgil, Advocate  for  the complainant.

Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Advocate for Opposite Party No.1.

Service of Opposite Party No.2 dispensed with vide order dated 27.11.2015.

 

PER DEV RAJ, MEMBER

            Vide our detailed order of the even date, recorded separately in Consumer Complaint No.309 of 2015 titled as ‘Mr. Pankaj Garg Vs. Puma Realtors Private Limited & Another’, this complaint has been partly accepted, with costs against Opposite Party No.1. The same (complaint) has been dismissed against Opposite Party No.2 with no order as to costs.

2.            Certified copy of the main order, passed in Consumer Complaint No.309 of 2015 titled as ‘Mr. Pankaj Garg Vs. Puma Realtors Private Limited & Another’, be placed on this file also.

3.           Copies of this order be sent to the parties free of charge.

Pronounced

April  26, 2016.

 

[JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH (RETD.)]

PRESIDENT

 

 

 

[DEV RAJ]

MEMBER

 

 

 

[PADMA PANDEY]

 MEMBER