Chandigarh

StateCommission

CC/694/2017

Lalit Kumar Dhiman - Complainant(s)

Versus

Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

Manish Jain, Adv.

15 Sep 2017

ORDER

ORDER

 

                  

                   

                    As per the prayer made, when amount claimed by the complainant under different heads is added, it goes to beyond Rs.1 crore. Faced with the ratio of judgments passed by Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in the cases of AMBRISH KUMAR SHUKLA & 21 ORS. Vs. FERROUS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD., Consumer Case No.97 of 2016, decided on 07.10.2016 & M/s OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. Vs. LALITHA SAINI, First Appeal No.1364 of 2017, decided on 21.08.2017, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file it again before the competent Commission.

                   Liberty granted.

                   Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn.

                   Spare copy be retained for the office record and all the three original paper-books be returned to the Counsel for the complainant.

                   Certified copies of the order be sent to the parties free of charge.

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.