Punjab

Mansa

CC/20/50

Sakuntla Devi - Complainant(s)

Versus

PUDA - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Deepak Kansal

29 Oct 2021

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MANSA
PUNJAB
 
Complaint Case No. CC/20/50
( Date of Filing : 24 Aug 2020 )
 
1. Sakuntla Devi
W/o Mahabir Parshad C/o Shree Mahabir Trading Company New Bus Stand Road Hansi.
Hisar
Haryana
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. PUDA
PUDA Authority (Now BDA) Puda Complex Bhagu Road Bathinda through its Estate officer.
Bathinda
Punjab
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  R.L.MITTAL PRESIDENT
  Suraj Goyal MEMBER
  Sharda Attri MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Sh. Deepak Kansal, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 Sh. Narinder Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
Dated : 29 Oct 2021
Final Order / Judgement

For orders see CC No.78 of 2019 title Jaspal Versus PUDA

 
 
[ R.L.MITTAL]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Suraj Goyal]
MEMBER
 
 
[ Sharda Attri]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.