Karnataka

Kolar

CC/42/2012

A.Narasimhamrthy - Complainant(s)

Versus

Public Information Officer - Opp.Party(s)

20 Mar 2012

ORDER

The District Consumer Redressal Forum
District Office Premises, Kolar 563 101.
 
CC NO. 42 Of 2012
 
1. A.Narasimhamrthy
S/o.Late Anjinappa,Age 26 years occ,Tiles Cotract& RTI Activist,R/o. Namagondalu Janatha Colony,Gowribidanur Taluk-561206.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Public Information Officer
o/o.District Health Officer(DHO),Chickaballapura-562101.
2. District Health Officer
o/o.District Health Officer(DHO),Chickaballapura-562101.
3. Administrative Medical Officer
Primary Health Centre,Namagondalu,Gowribidanur-561206.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

  Date of Filing : 13.03.2012

  Date of Order : 20.03.2012

 

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KOLAR

 

Dated 20th MARCH 2012

 

PRESENT

 

Sri. H.V. RAMACHANDRA RAO, B.Sc., BL,   …….                PRESIDENT

 

Sri. T.NAGARAJA, B.Sc., LLB.                        ……..     MEMBER

 

Smt. K.G.SHANTALA, B.A., LLB.                    ……..     MEMBER

 

Consumer Complaint No. 42 / 2012

 

Sri. A.Narasimhamurthy

S/o.Late Anjinappa,

Tiles Contract & RTI Activist,

r/a.Namagondalu Janatha Colony,

Gowribidnur Taluk -561 206                                  …..    Complainant

 

V/s.

 

1. Public Information  Officer,    

    O/o.District Health Officer (DHO)

    Chickaballapur– 562 101.

 

2. District Health Officer,

    O/o. District Health Officer (DHO),

    Chickaballapur -562 101.

 

3. Administrative Medical Officer,

    Primary Health Centre,

    Namagondalu,

    Gowribidnur -561 206.                                        …… Opposite Parties

ORDER

 

By Sri. H.V. RAMACHANDRA RAO, PRESIDENT

 

The Complainant has made this Complaint seeking direction to the Ops to furnish information sought by him under the Right to Information Act and also sought compensation of Rs.20,000/- making certain allegation. 

 

2.       On perusal of the Complaint, Complainant is seeking relief against Ops on the ground that they have failed to submit the information sought for, under the Right to Information Act.  Here the Complainant is only an Applicant and not a consumer as held by our Hon’ble State Commission and Hon’ble National Commission in recent cases.  In view of the above, Complainant is at liberty to move the Authorities under the RTI Act in Appeal or sue the Ops for damages in Civil Court.  That liberty is reserved.  In view of the above, we pass the following order:

 

ORDER

 

1.       Complaint is dismissed.  No costs.

 

 

2.       Return extra sets to the parties concerned under the Regulation 20(3) of the Consumer Protection Regulations 2005.

         

3.       Send copy of the Order to both the parties free of costs.

 

(Dictated to the Stenographer, got it transcribed and corrected and pronounced in the open Forum on this the 20th day of March 2012)

 

 

 

T. NAGARAJA          K.G.SHANTALA           H.V.RAMACHANDRA RAO

    Member                         Member                                       President

                      

 

 

SSS

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.