The case record is posted today for hearing. Both the Complainant and his Advocate are absent and no steps on their behalf is taken up. On repeated calls, both the Complainant and his Advocate are also absent. Thus, the hearing of the case could not be taken up. 

                                         The Advocate for O.P is present & files hazira and also files a memo on the ground stated therein. As it appears from the case record, the O.P was appeared on 21.06.2018 and written version filed on 20.07.2018. But, the Complainant remained absent since 12.05.2020 and slept over the matter and also no step is taken on his behalf. From the above nature and conduct of the Complainant, it is clearly made out that the Complainant has no interest to prosecute his case and unnecessarily wasted the valuable time of this Commission. On the other hand, the Complainant has filed the present case for non-providing the information sought for through the R.T.I Act by the O.P, who is none but the P.I.O of the Executive Engineer, NESCO, Soro. So, the Complainant has to choose the proper forum for remedy. That apart, non-taking of steps by the Complainant since long and absence of the Complainant on repeated calls clearly shows that the Complainant has no interest to prosecute the case. In the above facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature and conduct of the Complainant, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the Complainant should be dismissed.         

                                         Accordingly, the complaint of the Complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case.