Punjab

Patiala

CC/16/326

Dev Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Pspcl - Opp.Party(s)

Sh Rohit Sharma

29 Nov 2017

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,Patiala
Patiala
 
Complaint Case No. CC/16/326
( Date of Filing : 19 Aug 2016 )
 
1. Dev Singh
s/p Madho Singh r/o vill Kansua Khurad Teh Nabha
patiala
punjab
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Pspcl
paiala through its Chairman
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Smt. Neena Sandhu PRESIDENT
  Neelam Gupta Member
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 29 Nov 2017
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,

PATIALA.

 

                                      Consumer Complaint No. 326 of 19.8.2016

                                      Decided on:           29.11.2017

 

Dev Singh, aged about 67 years, son of Madho Singh R/o Village Kansua Khurd, Tehsil Nabha, District Patiala.

                                                                   …………...Complainant

                                      Versus

1.       Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. Patiala through its Chairman.

2.       The Executive Engineer Punjab State Power Corporation  Ltd. Grid Chowk, Nabha,Tehsil Nabha, District Patiala.

3.       The SDO, Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd., Ghamrauda Grid Chowk, Nabha Tehsil Nabha, District Patiala.

                                                                   …………Opposite Parties

                                      Complaint under Section 12 of the

                                      Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

 

QUORUM

                                      Smt. Neena Sandhu, President

                                      Smt. Neelam Gupta, Member                              

                                                                            

ARGUED BY:

                                      Sh.Rohit Sharma,Advocate,counsel for complainant.

                                      Sh.Pawan Puri,Advocate,counsel for Opposite parties.         

 ORDER

                                        SMT.NEENA SANDHU, PRESIDENT

Sh. Dev Singh complainant has filed this complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act,1986 ( hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the Opposite Parties (hereinafter referred to as the O.Ps.). The brief facts of the complaint are as under:

  1.  
  2.  
  3.  

The ld.counsel for the OPs has tendered in evidence Er.Sachin Kumar,SDO alongwith documents Exs.OP1 & OP2 evidence.

  1.  
  2.  
  3.  
  4.  

“ for release of tubewell connection under general or Priority Categories minimum land holding of one acre shall be pre-requisite.” From the declaration letter dated 22.1.2013, Ex.OP1, it is evident that complainanthad declared that he is the owner of 2.5 bighas of land. Since the complainant is having less than one acre of land therefore, he is not entitled to get the electric connection for tubewell under the said scheme. It may be stated here that once the complainant wasnot entitled to get the electric connection for tubewell under the said scheme, then by getting deposited the amountof Rs.71703/-from the complainant, the Ops have committed deficiency in service and are thus liable to refund the total amount got deposited from the complainant i.e. Rs.71703/- + Rs.2000/-alongwith interest from the respective dates of deposits. They are also liable to compensate the complainant for the mental agonyand physical harassment suffered by the complainant alongwith litigation expenses.

  1.  
  1. To refund the security amount of Rs.2000/- and an amount of Rs.71,703/- alongwith interest  @7% per annum from the respective dates of deposit till  realization;.
  2. To pay Rs.10,000/-  as compensation  on account of mental agony and physical harassment caused to the complainant;
  3. To pay Rs.5000/- as litigation expenses.

The Ops are further directed to comply the order within a period of  30 days from the date of the receipt of the certified copy of this order. Certified copies of this order be sent to the parties free of cost under the Rules.Thereafter, file be indexed and consigned to the Record Room.

ANNOUNCED

DATED:29.11. 2017    

                                                                   NEENA SANDHU

                                                                       PRESIDENT

 

 

                                                                   NEELAM GUPTA

                                                                         MEMBER

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[ Smt. Neena Sandhu]
PRESIDENT
 
[ Neelam Gupta]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.