Punjab

Patiala

CC/10/515

Shiv Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

PSPC Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

Sarv Sh.B.M.Singh & K.S.Sidhu

29 Nov 2010

ORDER


DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, PATIALADISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM,#9A, OPPOSITE NIHAL BAGH PATIALA
CONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 515
1. Shiv Kumar ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. PSPC Ltd ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 29 Nov 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,PATIALA.

 

                                                   

                                                

Shiv Kumar aged about 35 years son of Sh.Hari Chand, resident of C/o SCO 45,1stPatiala.

 

                                                                                                                  

1.                Punjab State Power Corporation Limited Head Office, The Mall,Patiala

2.                S.D.O. West Sub Division, Punjab State Power Corporation Limited,Patiala.

 

                                                                            

 

 

                                     

                                                                        

 

                                      

                                     

                                     

                                     

                                     

Present:

For the complainant:       

For opposite parties:    

                                     

                                         

SH.INDERJIT SINGH, PRESIDENT

 

                                      

2.                                  

of  

                                       

3.                                    ygseko B/ n?w Jh dh fJZe Bzpo ;hb N?Ago ehsh jJh j? ns/ d{ih n?wH JhH dh ;hb sVh jJh j?.whNo y[fbnk jfJnk j?. uoh dk e/; j?. whNo we/ s/ g?e ehsk frnkwhich amounts to theft of energy by illegal means by the complainant and he is liable to pay for the same as per rules. That the above stated checking of above stated electricity connection      Anti Power Theft Police Station,Patiala for further action in the matter as per law. The complainant is not entitled for any compensation.All other averments made in the complaint have also been denied and have prayed that complaint be dismissed.

4.                                  

5.                                  

6.                                  &

7.                                  

8.                                  

                                     

Pronounced.

Dated:29.11.2010.

 

                                                                             

 

                                                                             

 

                                                                             

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


, , ,