Punjab

Amritsar

CC/15/580

Tilak Raj - Complainant(s)

Versus

PSPC Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

S. Baljinder SIngh Roopra

16 Oct 2015

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
SCO 100, District Shopping Complex, Ranjit Avenue
Amritsar
Punjab
 
Complaint Case No. CC/15/580
 
1. Tilak Raj
H.no. 267, Village Gehri Mandi, Jandiala Guru, Amritsar
Amritsar
Punjab
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. PSPC Ltd.
The Mall, Patiala
Patiala
Punjab
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Sh. Bhupinder Singh PRESIDENT
  Kulwant Kaur MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

Before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal   Forum,  Amritsar.

                                                                             Complaint Case No.580/15

                                                                   Date of institution : 16.9.2015

Date of decision    : 16.10.2015

Sh.Tilak Raj son of Sh.Ram Lal resident of H.No.267, Village Gehri Mandi, Jandiala Guru, District Amritsar.

…………….Complainant

Versus

  1. Punjab State Power Corporation Limited through its Chairman, The Mall, Patiala.

  2. S.D.O., Punjab State Power Corporation Limited, Sub Division Jandiala Guru, G.T.Road, Tehsil and District Amritsar.

  3. Concerned J.E., Punjab State Power Corporation Limited, Sub Division Jandiala Guru, G.T.Road, Tehsil and District Amritsar.

…………..Opposite parties

Complaint under of Consumer Protection Act

QUORUM : Sh.Bhupinder Singh President, Ms.Kulwant Kaur Bajwa, Member

………………

ORDER

Present : Sh.Baljinder Singh, Adv.counsel for the complainant

Sh.N.S.Sandhu, Adv.counsel for the opposite parties

  Opposite parties filed written version in which they stated that meter of the complainant was checked by the JE of the opposite party namely Sh.Nirmal Singh on 7.9.2015 and found that meter of the complainant was missing from the box and the complainant has been consuming the electricity by attaching direct wires thereby by bye passing the meter. Resultantly, it was found a case of theft of energy. Opposite party has produced on record copy of the said report dated 7.9.2015, copy of ledger, photographs and complaint letter written by the opposite party bearing No.1680 dated 10.9.2015 to the SHO, Anti Power Theft Police Station, Amritsar regarding registration of a case against the complainant. Opposite party also produced on record copy of the notice u/s 135 of the Electricity Act bearing No.1679 dated 10.9.2015. All this shows that present case is a case of theft of energy.

In view of the judgement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in case titled as U.P.Power Corporation Ltd. & others Versus Anis Ahmed in Civil Appeal No.5466 of 2012 decided on 1.7.2013, this Forum has no jurisdiction to try and decide present complaint being a case of theft of energy. So, complaint is returned to the complainant with liberty to file the same in the appropriate court having jurisdiction. Copy of the orders be furnished to the parties free of costs. Papers are ordered to be consigned to the record room.


 

16.10.2015 ( Bhupinder Singh )

President


 

( Kulwant Kaur Bajwa )

Member

 

 

 
 
[ Sh. Bhupinder Singh]
PRESIDENT
 
[ Kulwant Kaur]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.