Punjab

Barnala

RBT/CC/18/293

Bikramjit Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

PSPC Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Gursher Singh Gill

17 Aug 2022

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. RBT/CC/18/293
 
1. Bikramjit Singh
VPO Bhangali Kalan, Amritsar
Amritsar
Punjab
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. PSPC Ltd.
The Mall, Patiala
Patiala
Punjab
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sh.Ashish Kumar Grover PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Navdeep Kumar Garg MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 17 Aug 2022
Final Order / Judgement

17.8.2022 Present: Sh. Dalip Singh complainant alongwith Sh. Gursher Singh Adv counsel for complainant.

Sh. Rajiv Kumar AEE PSPCL Sub Division Majitha-2 alongwith Sh. N.S. Sandhu Advocate counsel for opposite party.

 

Sh. Rajiv Kumar AEE PSPCL Sub Division Majitha-2 alongwith Sh. N.S. Sandhu Advocate counsel for opposite party has suffered the statement that I stated on behalf of the PSPCL Sub Division Majitha-2 that the opposite party will release the connection to the Bikramjit Singh complainant against the amount deposited of Rs. 77,723/- vide receipt No. 435/3349 dated 24.7.2013 as per rules and regulations of the PSPCL, If the complainant submit the paper/proof of ownership and possession record with the opposite party. He further stated that presently the tubewell connection is not given to the complainant due to non submission of paper/proof of ownership and possession record with the opposite party.

On the other hand, Sh. Dalip Singh son of Sh. Banta Singh resident of Village Bhangali Kalan Tehsil and District Amritsar Special power of attorney of Bikramjit Singh son of Dalip Singh complainant alongwith Sh. Gursher Singh counsel for complainant has also suffered the statement that I have been authorized by Sh. Bikramjit Singh to make the statement in the present complaint. I have heard the statement made by Sh. Rajiv Kumar AEE Sub Division Majitha-2 and the same is correct. He further stated that I will submit the paper/proof of ownership and possession with the opposite party. He further stated that presently I withdraw the present complaint on behalf of complainant.

In view of the statement of Sh. Dalip Singh Special Power of Attorney of Sh. Bikramjit Singh complainant, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. The opposite party is directed to release the above said tubewell connection to the complainant on submitting the paper/proof of ownership and possession record by the complainant with the opposite party. Copy of the order be supplied to the parties free of costs by the District Consumer Commission, Amritsar as per rules. File be sent back to the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Amritsar.

 

Member President

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sh.Ashish Kumar Grover]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Navdeep Kumar Garg]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.