Punjab

Patiala

CC/10/445

Bano Kaur - Complainant(s)

Versus

PSPC Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. P S Jaggi

26 Nov 2010

ORDER


DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, PATIALADISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM,#9A, OPPOSITE NIHAL BAGH PATIALA
CONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 445
1. Bano Kaur ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. PSPC Ltd. ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 26 Nov 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,PATIALA.

 

                                                 

                                                         

 

Bano Kaur w/o Sh.Chuhar Singh Resident of Bazigar Basti, Village Phagan Majra, 

 

 

                                                                                                                  

 

1.                Punjab State Power Corporation Limited through its Chief Managing Director.

2.                Assistant Executive Engineer, Operation Sub Division, Punjab State Power Corporation Limited,Reethkheri,DistrictPatiala. 

 

                                                                            

 

 

                                     

                                     

 

 

                                      

                                     

                                     

                                       

 

                            

Present:

For the complainant:    

For opposite parties:    

 

                                     

                                         

SH.INDERJIT SINGH, PRESIDENT

 

                                       

2.                                  

of  

                                       

“ Meter was burnt, the supply was connected directly.”

That the   

3.                                   whNo ;fVnk jfJnk j?.;gbkJh f;ZXh ubdh gkJh rJhwhich amounts to theft of energy by illegal means by the complainant and the complainant is liable to pay for the same as per rules. That the above stated checking of above stated electricity connection     

4.                                  

5.                                  

7.                                  Punjab

7.                                  

8.                                  

                                     

 

Pronounced.

Dated:26.11.2010.

 

          

 

                                                                             

 

                                                                             

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Smt. Neelam Gupta, MemberHONABLE MR. Inderjit Singh, PRESIDENT Mr. Amarjit Singh Dhindsa, Member