Punjab

Mansa

CC/08/178

Satya - Complainant(s)

Versus

PSEB - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Randeep Sharma

12 Feb 2009

ORDER


DCF, Mansa
DCF, New Court Rd, Mansa
consumer case(CC) No. CC/08/178

Satya		 ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

PSEB		 ...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:
1. Neena Rani Gupta 2. Sh Sarat Chander

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Present: None for the complainant. Sh. Sham Lal, Advocate counsel for the opposite parties. Neither the counsel for the complainant nor complainant has come present for tendering the evidence and for making payment of cost of Rs.100/-. Case was called several times during the day. The cause list has been exhausted. No date is possible in this case. It is 4.40 p.m. The complaint is dismissed in default. File be consigned to record. Neena Rani Gupta, Sarat Chander, Member Member




......................Neena Rani Gupta
......................Sh Sarat Chander