Kerala

Alappuzha

CC/09/392

N.P. Hamsa - Complainant(s)

Versus

Providence Chitty Fund & 8 others - Opp.Party(s)

29 Sep 2015

ORDER

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, ALAPPUZHA
Pazhaveedu P.O., Alappuzha
 
Complaint Case No. CC/09/392
 
1. N.P. Hamsa
Saina Manzil, Arookutty
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Providence Chitty Fund & 8 others
Eramalloor.P.O., Cherthala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. Elizabeth George PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Antony Xavier MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Jasmine. D. MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

 

 

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, ALAPPUZHA

Tuesday the 29th day of September, 2015.

Filed on 25.11.2009.

Present

 

      1.    Smt. Elizabeth George, President     

      2.    Sri. Antony Xavier, Member 

      3.    Smt. Jasmine, Member

in

C.C.No.392/2009

between

Complainant:-                                                                                Opposite Parties:-

                                                                                                                                                                Sri. N.P. Hamsa                                                             1.         Providence Chitty Fund

Saina Manzil,                                                                          Eramalloor P.O.

Arookkutty P.O.                                                                     Cherthala

 

                                                                                    2.         Smt. Joice Antony     

Nalampurackal House,

Thuravoor P.O.

Cherthala

 

3.Smt. Kathreena Agustin,

                                                                                                            -do-

 

4.         Sri. Varghese Antony

                                                                                                             -do-

 

                                                                                    5.         Sri. Wilson Antony

                                                                                                              -do-

 

                                                                                    6.         Sri. Siby Augustin

                                                                                                               -do-

 

7.         Sri. Saji Augustin

-do-

 

                                          8.        Sri. Sojan Augustin

-do-

 

 9.        Smt. Soni

         -do-

 

         (Adv.Byju.K. for O.P.Nos. 6 & 9)

                    

 

 

O R D E R

SRI. ANTONY XAVIER (MEMBER)

 

This is a remanded matter.  The case was once heard and the President of the then Forum passed the order on 31-05-2011 allowing the complaint.   Since there was no detailed order, Hon’ble State Commission suo motto taken up the matter and remanded the case for hearing for the purpose of passing a speaking order.  After remanded, notices were issued to both parties for hearing the matter.  Complainant has filed this complaint before the Forum on 25.11.2009 alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties.

2.  The brief facts of the allegations of the complainant is as follows:-   Complainants’ case is that the 1st opposite party is a firm that carries out chitty business in the name and style of Providence Chitty Fund.  The opposite parties 2 to 9 are the partners as well as the administration of the said firm.  The complainant subscribed a chitty No. 220 with opposite parties bearing Chittal No.57 and remitted an amount of Rs.67,500/- (Rupees Sixty Seven  Thousand five Hundred only) on towards this.  The 2 partners of the firms (Sri.Thomas Antony and Sri.Varghese Augustine) expired, other opposite parties assumed the administrative charge of this Firm.  All of a sudden the entire opposite parties have stopped the entire business transaction and closed down the office without making refund the remitted amount of Rs.67,500/- (Rupees Sixty Seven Thousand five Hundred Only) to the complainant.    There is deficiency of service on the part of the opposite parties.  The complainant sustained immeasurable mental agony.  Aggrieved on this the complainants approached this Forum.

3.  Notice issued to the opposite parties. Opposite parties 6 to 9 filed vakkalath but did not file any version.

4.  Complainant filed proof affidavit and produced 1 document marked as Exts.A1 is the original passbook of the complainant.  

5. Bearing in mind, the contentions of the complainant the sole question arises for consideration are whether the complainant entitled to the relief sought for?

            6. We carefully perused the materials placed before us. We went through the document produced by the complainant.  The complainants’ case stands well substantiated by the evidence put on record by the complainant.  As we have already observed, the opposite parties did not make it a point to turn up before this Forum.  Needless to say the case of the complainant stands un-assailed.  We hold that the complainant is entitled to the relief sought for.

            In the result, the complaint is allowed.  The opposite parties are directed to return the deposited amount of Rs.67,500/- (Rupees Sixty Seven Thousand Five Hundred Only) with interest @ 12% per Annum from the date of complaint before this Forum till the repayment of the entire amount to the complainants.  The opposite parties are further directed to pay an amount of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees  one thousand only) towards cost of this proceedings to the complainant.  No further amount is allowed towards compensation.  We further clarify that the liability of the opposite parties 2 to 9 are limited only to the value of properties inherited by them from the deceased partners named Sri.Thomas Antony and Sri.Varghese Augustine and the complainant are at liberty to proceed against the assets of the opposite parties 2 to 9 for the realization of the above amount with above limitation.  The order shall be complied within one month from the date of receipt of this order.

 

 

 

Pronounced in Open Forum on this the 29th day of September, 2015

                                                                        Sd/- Sri. Antony Xavier (Member)

 

Sd/- Smt. Elizabeth George (President)

 

Sd/- Smt. Jasmine D (Member)

 

 


APPENDIX:-

 

Evidence of the complainant:

 

Ext.A1 - Original passbook of Chitty account

 

Evidence of the opposite parties:       Nil.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-//True copy//-

   By Order,

 

 

Senior Superintendent.

 

Typed by: Pr/-   

 

Compd. By:                                                                 

  

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Elizabeth George]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Antony Xavier]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Jasmine. D.]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.