Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/31/2019

S.JAYARAMAN, - Complainant(s)

Versus

PROPRIETOR, AND ANOTHER - Opp.Party(s)

PARTY IN PERSON

28 Oct 2021

ORDER

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                            PRESIDENT

                         Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

F.A. No.31/2019

(Against the order in C.C.Sr. No.701/2018, dated:3.12.2018 on the file of

D.C.D.R.F., Coimbatore)

                                                                  DATED THE 28^TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021

S. Jayaraman,

S/o. Shunmugam,

6/125,3^rd Street, P.M.Samy street,

R.S.Puram, Coimbatore – 641 002.                                                                                      .. Appellants / Complainant

 

-Versus-

1. Proprietor,

Pazhamudir Nilayam,107,D.B. Road,

R.S. Puram, Coimbatore – 2.

 

2. Proprietor,

Sunfeast – ITC Ltd.,

37,Nehru Road, Kolkata – 700 071.                                                                                  .. Respondent / Opposite parties

 

For the Appellants / Complainant                                    : Party In Person

Counsel for the Respondent 1 / 1^st Opposite party        : M/s. Muthumani Doraisami

Counsel for the Respondent 2 / 2^nd Opposite party       : M/s. A. Mohammed Gouse

 

          This appeal coming up before us on 28.10.2021 for appearance of both and for arguments this Commission made the following order in open court:                                                                                           

Docket order

 

            No representation for Appellant and 1^st Respondent. 2^nd Respondent present.  The case is posted today for filing written arguments of appellant and 2^nd Respondent and arguments or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 10.30 a.m the appellant and 1^st Respondent did not appear, hence passed over and called again at 12.30 pm, then also there is no representation for appellant and 1^st Respondent and written arguments also not filed. Hence keeping the appeal pending is of no use as parties are not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence the appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to costs.

 

                    Sd/-                                                                                                      Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                           R.SUBBIAH                        

          MEMBER                                                                                              PRESIDENT