By Smt. Padmini Sudheesh, President: <br /> <br /> The authorised signatory and sales representative of the respondent firm Mr.Jomon approached the petitioner for taking a mobile phone connection. Mr. Jomon also promised that if the connection is taken at that time a land phone and a dinner set of YERA Company will be provided free of charge. So on that day itself on 15.12.05, the petitioner given Rs.2500/- and taken the connection. Land phone was given as per the promise but the dinner set not. Requested many times, but no result. After some days a bill dated 15.12.05 was sent by the respondent demanding Rs.890/- towards the period from 13.11.05 to 12.12.05. It is illegal. Subsequently on 6.1.06 connection was disconnected. Notice sent, no reply and no remedy. Hence this complaint.<br /> <br /> 2. Respondent was called absent and declared exparte on 23.4.07.<br /> <br /> 3. To prove the case the petitioner filed affidavit and three documents. The documents are marked as Exts. P1 to P3. <br /> <br /> 4. There is no evidence to the contrary. <br /> <br /> 5. According to the petitioner, he is entitled to get back the amount of Rs.2500/-. He also prays to give a direction to the respondent for take back the handset and mobile phone. He also prays for compensation and cost.<br /> <br /> 6. So the petition is allowed and the respondent is directed to return the amount of Rs.2500/- (Rupees two thousand and five hundred only) received from the petitioner and also directed to take back the handset and mobile phone from the petitioner. The respondent is further directed to provide Rs.1000/- (Rupees one thousand only) as compensation and Rs.500/- (Rupees five hundred only) towards costs. <br /> <br /> Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the open Forum, this the 30th day of June 2008.<br />