Kerala

Kollam

CC/47/2021

Anila P.Jacob, - Complainant(s)

Versus

Proprietor, Thomas Daniel, - Opp.Party(s)

Adv.P.SAJEEV BABU

17 Oct 2022

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Civil Station ,
Kollam-691013.
Kerala.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/47/2021
( Date of Filing : 10 Feb 2021 )
 
1. Anila P.Jacob,
Kottakkakathu Veedu,Ambipoika.P.O,Kundara,Kollam Dist.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Proprietor, Thomas Daniel,
Popular Exports, XIII/831,Vikas Road,Karuvelipady, Cochin-682005.
2. Y.Mathew Panicker,
Former Branch Manager,Popular Exports,Kundara Residing at,Maliyekkal Mathew Bhavan, Punnamukku, Perumpuzha.P.O.
3. T.Mathunni Panicker,
Branch Manager, Popular Exports, Kundara residing at Plavila Thekkathil Raju Nivas, Ambipioka,Kundara.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 17 Oct 2022
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL  COMMISSION, KOLLAM

Dated this the   17th      Day of  October   2022

 

  Present: -  Sri. E.M.Muhammed Ibrahim, B.A, LL.M. President

        Smt.S.Sandhya Rani, Bsc, L.L.B,Member

                   Sri.Stanly Harold, B.A.LLB, Member

 

                                                CC.47/2021

 

Anila P.Jacob                                              :         Complainant

Kottakkakathu Veedu

Ambipoika P.O

Kundara, Kollam Dist.

[By Adv.P.Sajeev Babu]

 

V/s

  1. Popular Exports                                 :         Opposite parties

       XIII/831, Vikas Road, Karuvelipady

      Cochin-682005

      Represented by its Proprietor

     Thomas Daniel.

 

  1. Y.Mathew Panicker

        Former Branch Manager

      Popular Exports

      Kundara

      Maliyekkal Mathew Bhavan,

      Punnamukku, Perumpuzha P.O.

 

  1. T.Mathunni Panicker

        Branch Manager

      Popular Exports, Kundara
      Residing at,

     Plavila Thekkathil

     Raju Nivas, Ambipoika

     Kundara.

 

 

FINAL    ORDER

E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM , B.A, LL.M, President

Complainant absent.  Counsel expressed no instruction when the case is posted for recording exparte evidence.  Hence we are of the view that the complainant has no oral evidence.  One document produced along with the complaint is only an unattested photocopy of the  F.D without producing the original F.D receipt.

Hence there is absolutely no evidence.

In the result  the complaint stands dismissed.

          No costs.

Dated this the  17th   day of   October  2022.

 

 

E.M.Muhammed Ibrahim:Sd/-

S.Sandhya Rani:Sd/-

           Stanly Harold:Sd/-

         Forwarded/by Order

          Senior Superintendent

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.