Orissa

Rayagada

CC/94/2018

A.Sadananda Behera - Complainant(s)

Versus

Proprietor S.G. Mobile Point - Opp.Party(s)

Self

30 Aug 2018

ORDER

DISTRICT   CONSUMER  DISPUTES REDRESSAL    FORUM, RAYAGADA,

STATE:  ODISHA.

C.C. Case  No. 94 / 2018.                                         Date.    30  . 8   . 2018.

P R E S E N T .

Dr. Aswini  Kumar Mohapatra,                          President

Sri Gadadhara Sahu,                                                                       Member.

Smt.Padmalaya Mishra,.                                                                Member

 

Sri A.Sadananda Behera, S/O: A.Tumbanath Behera,  Jagannath temple street,  Po/ Dist.Rayagada, State:  Odisha.                                                    …….Complainant

Vrs.

1.The Proprietor, S.G.Mobile  point, Rayagada.

2.The Manager, Telecom  Network India Pvt. Ltd., Palam New Delhi.

3.The Manager, ZEN House, plot No. 261, Western Marg,New  delhi.                                                                                                    .…..Opp.Parties

.

                                        J u d g e m e n t.

         

          The  present disputes arises out of the complaint petition filed by the above named complainant alleging deficiency in service  against  afore mentioned O.Ps for non refund of  price  towards  Mobile phone which was  not functioning within the warranty period.

            On being noticed   and  as per the  instruction of  the  complainant O.Ps are given proper service  in as much as the O.Ps have rectified  all defects of the above set   in question   to the satisfaction of the complainant & there is no defect in the said set. 

            The O.Ps  considering the exigencies   of  the matter with out any basis   in the right time properly settled the disputes  at his end to avoid further litigation by  over looking  all the deficiencies  without contesting the present case  in the sense of humanitarian point of view  by following  the principles of  natural  justice in view of justice as contemplated  the  Modos  Operandi  of the O.Ps   no doubt  worthy of credence.

            We perused the documents   filed by the complainant  as well as the O.Ps in our considered view   there is nothing  to disbelieve  the contents of the O.Ps regarding  their service  to  the satisfaction of the complainant  and forum do not find any reason  to hold the O.Ps.

                Accordingly the present dispute mitigated  and the  case stands disposed    but O.Ps wriggled out of  liabilities & the  case closed against  them    as  the  complainant   do not want to  proceed  with  the case further against the O.Ps  after rectification the defects of the Motor cycle. Parties are left  to bear their own cost.

Dictated and corrected by me

Pronounced on this        30^th.         Day of       August,   2018.

               

                 

                Member.                                                             Member.                                      President

 

 

Written by the   president in her own hand   Sri Aswini  Mohapatra.

          The  complainant  personally present  &  filed a memo to close the case as because the O.P’s (Service Centre) repaired  the defective  mobile set as per the satisfaction of the complainant  and the  problem  is solved  with fully and final satisfaction of his complaint  which has been settled out of court. Further the complainant  do not wants to proceed  the case  against the O.Ps.  Heard the complaint.  Perused the Memo. Allowed the submission of the complaint.  Accordingly the case is closed    as the complainant  does not wants to press  further   proceeding.     The present case is closed. Supply copies of the order to the party concerned  and immediately  on demand  free of  charges.