Kerala

StateCommission

A/5/2020

SYLAJA B - Complainant(s)

Versus

PROPRIETOR-KRISHNA GAS AGENCY - Opp.Party(s)

RAJMOHAN C S

15 Dec 2020

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
 
First Appeal No. A/5/2020
( Date of Filing : 03 Jan 2020 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. CC/366/2014 of District Alappuzha)
 
1. SYLAJA B
.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. PROPRIETOR-KRISHNA GAS AGENCY
.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.K.SURENDRA MOHAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. SRI.T.S.P.MOOSATH JUDICIAL MEMBER
  SRI.RANJIT.R MEMBER
  SMT.BEENAKUMARI.A MEMBER
  SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 15 Dec 2020
Final Order / Judgement

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

APPEAL No. 05/2020

JUDGMENT DATED: 15.12.2020

(Against the Order in C.C. 366/2014 of CDRF, Alappuzha)

PRESENT:

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. K. SURENDRA MOHAN              : PRESIDENT

SRI.T.S.P. MOOSATH                                                       : JUDICIAL MEMBER

SRI.RANJIT. R                                                                   : MEMBER

SMT. BEENA KUMARY. A                                              : MEMBER

SRI. K.R. RADHAKRISHNAN                                        : MEMBER

PETITIONER/APPELLANT:

 

Shylaja B, Karthika Pazhaveed P.O., Alappuzha now residing at F4 Mullackal Palace, Mullackal Nagar, Tripunithura-682 306, Ernakulam.

 

                   (By Adv. Rajmohan C.S.)

 

COUNTER PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS:

 

  1. Proprietor, Krishna Gas Agency, Convent Square, Alappuzha.

(By Advs. S.  Reghukumar & Threya J. Pillai)

  1. Area Manager, Indian Oil Corporation, Panampally Nagar, Cochin.
  2. Administrative Manager, National Insurance Company, Mumbai Corporate Regional Office, 2nd floor, Royal Insurance Building 14, Jamshadji Tata Road, Church Gate, Mumbai-400 020.

                            

JUDGMENT

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. K. SURENDRA MOHAN : PRESIDENT

Heard Adv. Nithya who appears for the appellant as well as Adv. S. Reghukumar who appears for the 1st respondent. Though respondents 2 & 3 have been served with notice they have not chosen to enter appearance. 

This is a case in which the complaint filed by the appellant has been dismissed for default. The limited request made by the counsel for the appellant is for a remand to the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Alappuzha (hereinafter referred to as the District Forum for short) for being tried and disposed of in accordance with law on the merits. We are satisfied that the said request can be allowed.

In view of the above, this appeal is allowed. The order dated 30.11.2015 in C.C. No. 366/2014 of Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Alappuzha is set aside. The District Forum is directed to take the complaint back to file, and to dispose of the same on the merits after recording evidence. Considering that the matter has been pending for a long time, an effort to dispose of the complaint expeditiously shall be made. 

 

 

JUSTICE K. SURENDRA MOHAN  : PRESIDENT

T.S.P. MOOSATH   : JUDICIAL MEMBER

RANJIT. R                : MEMBER

                                                                        BEENA KUMARY. A         : MEMBER

Jb                                                                     K.R. RADHAKRISHNAN  : MEMBER

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.K.SURENDRA MOHAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SRI.T.S.P.MOOSATH]
JUDICIAL MEMBER
 
 
[ SRI.RANJIT.R]
MEMBER
 
 
[ SMT.BEENAKUMARI.A]
MEMBER
 
 
[ SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.