Telangana

Karimnagar

45/2012

Katakam Radha - Complainant(s)

Versus

Propietor, Panchasheela Enterpries - Opp.Party(s)

V.Rajesh

26 Sep 2014

ORDER

PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI B.SURESH, B.A.LL.M, 1st ADDL. DIST. AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND PRESIDENT (FAC)
SRI G.SREENIVAS RAO, M.Sc.,B.Ed., LL.B., PGADR (NALSAR), MEMBER
 
Complaint Case No. 45/2012
 
1. Katakam Radha
W/o. Mallaiah, age 35 years, Occ: Agrl. R/o. H.No. 5-106/15, Narsimhulapally village of Gangadhara mdl, Karimnagar dist.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Propietor, Panchasheela Enterpries
Mahendra Tractors dealer Kothi rampur, Karimnagar
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI B.SURESH, B.A.LL.M, 1st ADDL. DIST. AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. G.SREENIVAS RAO, M.Sc.,B.Ed., LL.B., PGADR, NALSAR MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:V.Rajesh, Advocate
For the Opp. Party: V.Srinivas and K. Gopalkrishna and LV.R. Rao, Advocate
ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM ::AT:: KARIMNAGAR, TELANGANA STATE.

PRESENT: HON'BLE SRI B.SURESH, B.A., LL.M., Ist ADDL. DIST. & SESSIONS JUDGE AND PRESIDENT (FAC)
                                   AND

SRI G.SREENIVASRAO, M.Sc.,B.Ed.,LL.B., PGADR (NALSAR), MEMBER

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, TWO THOUSAND FOURTEEN

CONSUMER COMPLAINT  NO. 45 OF 2012

Between:-

Katkam Radha, W/o. Mallaiah, Agew 35 years, Occ: Agrl., R/o H.No.5-106/15, Narsimhulapally V/o. Gangadhara mandal of Karimnagar dist.

                                                 ... Complainant  

     AND

1.The Proprietor, Panchasheel Enterprises, Mahindra Tractor Dealer, Kothirampur, Karimnagar City.

2.The Manager, Mahindra Finance, Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd., H.No. 8-6-396, Upstairs of Select Motors, Kothirampur, Karimnagar.

3.The Manager, Farm Equipment Sector, Mahindra Tractors, Akurli Road, Kandhivilly (E), Mumbai – 400 001.

4.The Proprietor, Bakar Harvestors, Gurunanak  Agriculture Engineering Works, Hundaiya (Barnala) – 148 107.

                                                                                                                                   … Opposite Party no.1 to 4

          This complaint is coming up before us for hearing on  26-9-2014, in the presence of Sri V. Rajesh and P. Sudhakar, Advocates for complainant and Sri V. Srinivas, Advocate for opposite party no.1 and Sri  K. Gopalakrishna, Advocates for opposite party no.2 and Sri L. V. Ramana Rao and M. Narsingrao, Advocates for opposite party no.3. The opposite party no.4 remained exparte, and on perusing the material papers on record, and having stood over for consideration till this day, the Forum passed the following:

::ORDER::

          The complainant filed memo for full and final satisfaction as he already settled the matter for Rs.,7,50,000/- which has been already received through D.Ds.    

         Hence the matter stands closed.

 

Written and corrected by me, after correction the orders pronounced by us in the open court this the 26th day of September, 2014.

 

Sd/-                                                                                                                   Sd/-

MEMBER                                                                                                  PRESIDENT (FAC)

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI B.SURESH, B.A.LL.M, 1st ADDL. DIST. AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. G.SREENIVAS RAO, M.Sc.,B.Ed., LL.B., PGADR, NALSAR]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.