Orissa

Baudh

CC/40/2017

Ramesh Chandra Panigrahi - Complainant(s)

Versus

Prop.Choice Footwear - Opp.Party(s)

27 Mar 2018

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BOUDH
NEAR CIRCUIT HOUSE, BOUDH, 762014
 
Complaint Case No. CC/40/2017
( Date of Filing : 09 Aug 2017 )
 
1. Ramesh Chandra Panigrahi
At:Palas Po:Butupali Dist:Boudh
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Prop.Choice Footwear
Daily market,Boudh At/Po/Dist:Boudh
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Padmanava Mahakul PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Mamatarani Mahapatra MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Suvendu Kumar Paikaray MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 27 Mar 2018
Final Order / Judgement

         1.Alleging deficiency of service and  unfair trade practice, the complainant filed this case against the O.Ps for compensation of Rs.5,000/-.

        2.The brief fact of the case is that on 22.7.2017, the complainant has  purchased 2 pairs of foot wear from the O.Ps and on payment of Rs.190/- for the cost of  two pairs. If the O.P provide cash memo an extra Rs.30/- to be paid by the complainant. So the complainant paid Rs.220/- for the cost of two pairs of foot wear. The O.P by adopting unfair trade practice did not supply the bill and supplied an estimate slip of Rs.220/- for the cost of 2 foot wear instead of supplying original cash memo. So the complainant filed this case before this forum for compensation of Rs.5,000/-.

   3. Being noticed, the O.Ps appeared in this case and did not file any counter nor take part in the hearing for which he was set ex-parte.

    4.The complainant is a consumer under C.P.Act and he has paid Rs.220/- for the cost of 2 pairs of foot wear. The O.P. supplied estimate slip of Rs.220/- to the complainant instead of supplying original cash memo by adopting unfair trade practice. As such the O.P caused unfair trade practice against the complainant.

    Taking into consideration of the case of the complainant and documents filed by him, we allow the case of the complainant in part and direct the O.P to supply original cash memo alongwith Rs.4,000/-(Rupees four thousand) only  towards compensation for  his mental agony within one month from the date of this order, failing which the complainant is at liberty to take steps against the O.Ps for realization of awarded amount. This case is disposed of accordingly.

      Order pronounced in the open court under the seal and signature of the forum this the 27th day of March, 2018.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Padmanava Mahakul]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Mamatarani Mahapatra]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Suvendu Kumar Paikaray]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.