DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NORTH-WEST

CSC-BLOCK-C, POCKET-C, SHALIMAR BAGH, DELHI-110088

C.C. No: 1624/2015

DINESH TIWARI                                                                    … COMPLAINANT

Versus

M/s PROFESSIONAL COURIERS NETWORK LTD.         … OPPOSITE PARTY                   

COMPLAINT U/S 12 CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986

CORAM:   SH. M.K. GUPTA, PRESIDENT

       SH. BARIQ AHMED, MEMBER

       MS. USHA KHANNA, MEMBER

ORDER                           Date: 09.01.2017

SH. M.K. GUPTA, PRESIDENT

Perused file. It is true that none is appearing for complainant since last dates of hearings i.e. 21.03.2016, 19.05.2016, 23.08.2016, 17.10.2016 & 09.01.2017 consecutively. Court notice through speed post has been issued to the complainant but could not be served due to reason “insufficient address” as per track report. There is no other address of the complainant on the file.

It appears that complainant is not interested in persuing her case. It will be abuse of process to proceed further in the absence of complainant. Hence complaint is dismissed in default for the reasons mentioned above.

File be consigned to record room.

Announced on this 9^th January, 2017.

(MEMBER)                           (MEMBER)                             (PRESIDENT)