Date of Filing: 29-12-2016
Date of Order: 20-03-2020
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM – I, HYDERABAD
P r e s e n t
HON’BLE Sri P.VIJENDER, B.Sc. L.L.B., PRESIDENT
HON’BLE Sri K.RAM MOHAN, B.Sc. M.A L.L.B., MEMBER
HON’BLE Smt. CH. LAKSHMI PRASANNA, B.Sc. LLM. (PGD (ADR)
MEMBER
On this the Friday the 20th day of March, 2020
C.C.No.76 /2017
Between
Mohd. Javeed Uddin,
H.No.1-73/8, Shop No.1, Ahmed Plaza,
Opp: R T T C, Gachibowli, Hyderabad T.S.32. ……Complainant
And
Proprietor,
Professional Courier, 101, Jade Arcade,
M.G. Road, Paradise, Secunderabad,
Hyderabad, T.S. – 500 003.
Rep.by Thomas John. ….Opposite Party
Counsel for the complainant : Sri Krishna Rao
Counsel for the opposite Parties : M/s.D.Madhava Rao
O R D E R
(By Sri K.RAM MOHAN, B.Sc. M.A L.L.B., MEMBER on behalf of the
bench)
- This complaint has been instituted under Section 12 of C.P. Act 1986 alleging that non-payment of arrears on accrued commission from October, 2015 to September, 2016, not refunding the deposited amount etc., on the part of the opposite party amounts to deficiency in service, thereby praying this Forum to direct the opposite party to pay ……
- Rs.10,865/- towards arrears of commission accrued to him from October 2015 to September,2016
- Rs.5,000/- being the refundable security deposit paid by the complainant.
- Rs.20,000/-being the amount spent by the complainant to purchase the office equipment and furniture, in the hope of running the business.
- Rs.50,000/- towards harassment and mental anguish caused by the opposite party to the complainant.
- Rs.84,000/- being the rents paid by the complainant in the hope of continuation of courier business.
- To pay for cost of complaint and
- For any other relief / reliefs as may be deemed fit and proper.
- Briefly stated the facts of the case relevant for disposal of this complaint are that :
Complainant entered into an agreement on dated 26.10.15 with the opposite party by depositing the amount of Rs.5,000/- towards security which is refundable if the said agreement is cancelled by the opposite parties within a period of 12 months from the date of commencing of the agreement, for the purpose of carrying on business on the name and style of “express collection center” . In pursuance of the agreement the complainant commenced activities of booking of consignments by collecting amounts from the consigners, which is collected by the representative of the opposite party every day. The obligation of the opposite party, as per the contract is payment of commission amount @ 25% on domestic destinations and 10% on the international destinations to the complainant for which the opposite party started supplying printing material and related stationary to the complainant. The opposite party stopped delivering the required stationary to the complainant with an intention to close the business with the complainant. All the efforts put up by the complainant for getting stationary and to continue the business have futile. As the opposite party failed to supply to do so the complainant despite making personal visits to the office of the opposite party could not get his arrears of commission as per the contract w.e.f. October, 2015. In spite of receiving the legal notice by the opposite party the complainant could not get his arrears of commission nor refund of security deposit. Hence this complaint with a prayer to grant relief, as stated supra.
3) The opposite party by resisting the complaint has filed it is written version contending that the complaint is not maintainable on the ground that the complainant is not a consumer. In view of the agreement as stated above entered between them is on the basis of business to business entities and pleading that purpose of the agreement amounts is on “commercial purpose” .As such this Forum cannot entertain the complaint filed by the complainant before this Forum for adjudication of the dispute. Hence praying this Forum to dismiss the complaint with costs.
4) During the course of enquiry, the complainant has filed evidence affidavit supported by 7 documents which have been got
marked as A1 to A7. For the opposite parties evidence affidavit has been filed support by 12 documents which have been got marked as Exhibit B1 to B12. Both the parties have filed written arguments and advanced oral arguments. Heard the learned counsel for the both and on perusal of the documents brought on record in order to adjudicate the dispute for the purpose of disposal of this complaint the following points have now emerged for consideration:
- Whether carrying on activities under the said agreement amounts to commercial purpose and the complaint is maintainable?
- Whether the complainant is entitled to releifs as claimed for in the complaint? if so what reliefs.
On appreciating the facts and evidences by considering pleadings and material on record this Forum has come to the conclusion as mentioned in which the following points.
5) Point No.(i):-. As per the copy of the agency agreement dated 20th October, 2015, filed by the complainant vide Exhibit A1, as is vivid and distinct that the complainant has claimed his occupation in it as “business”. The activities require to be carried on for and her booking consignment, collection of amounts for the same, handing over the collected opposite parties representative at his office and payment of commission by the opposite party @ 25% of domestic destination and 10% international destinations to the complainant from day to day basis tantamount to business / commercial purpose. The complainant also nowhere has pleaded that the said activities being carried on for the purpose of earning his livelihood by means of self – employment. Considering this discussion in view and taking provisions of the Sec.2(1)(d) (ii) of the Consumer Protection ACT, 1986 the complainant is not a consumer and the complaint filed by him before this Forum is not maintainable. As such this Forum has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the dispute. Even on merits also as per the agreement the opposite party is not liable to make any payment to the complainant. As such there is no deficiency in service in making payment to the complainant by the opposite party . Hence the answer at this point is against the complainant but in favour of the opposite party.
6) Point No.3: In view of the discussions held in point No.(i) the complainant is not entitled to any relief as prayed for in the complaint.
In the result, the complaint is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Dictated to steno, transcribed and typed by her, pronounced by us on this the 20th day of ,March 2020
MEMBER MEMBER PRESIDENT
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
WITNESS EXAMINED
Nil
Exs. filed on behalf of the Complainant:
Ex.A1 - Copy of Agency Agreement dt.20.10.2015
Ex.A2 – Copy o0f Legal notice dt. 11.10..2016
Ex.A3 – Reply legal notice
Ex.A4 – Amount paid to opposite party
Ex.A5 – Rental agreement, 22.9.2015
Ex.A6 – Xerox copies of voucher
Ex.A7 – Verified affidavit
Exs. filed on behalf of the Opposite party
Ex.B1 Mismanagement of cash bookings
Ex.B2 – Intimation about dues
Ex.B3 - Copy of missing of C notes
Ex.A4 – Receipt dt.23.7.2016
Ex.B5 – Letter to opposite parties dt.20.10.2015
Ex.A6 – Copy of cash sales Debit vouchers dt.20.12.2015
Ex.B7 – Debit vouchers dt.20.12.2015
Ex.B8 - Copy of Pro commission details
Ex.B9 - Copy of Pro commission details
Ex.B10 - Copy of Pro commission details
Ex.B11 - Copy of Pro commission details
Ex.B12 – Booking Statement
MEMBER MEMBER PRESIDENT