Chandigarh

DF-I

CC/762/2010

Harjap Singh Kahlon - Complainant(s)

Versus

Principal Secretary of Govt. Punjab - Opp.Party(s)

22 Dec 2010

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 762 of 2010
1. Harjap Singh Kahlonage 68 Yeras son of Sh. Tarlok Singh Resident of HOuse No. 432 SEctor-7, Panchkula(Haryana) ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Principal Secretary of Govt. PunjabHousing Development Authority, Mini Secretariat Sector-9, Chandigarh2. The Chief Administrator, Punjab Urban Planning & DevelopmentAuthority Sector-68 Distt. SAS nagar Mohali3. The EState OfficerGretaer Mohali Development Authority Sector-68 Distt. SAS Nagar Mohali ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 22 Dec 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I

U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

Complaint Case No. 762 of 2010

 

 

Harjap Singh Kahlon age 68 years son of Sh.Tarlok Singh, resident of House No.432, Sector 7, Panchkula (Haryana).                  

                                                                             

                                                                              –          Complainant

 

                                                            Versus

 

1.         Principal Secretary to Govt. of Punjab, Housing Development Authority, Mini Secretariat, Sector 9, Chandigarh.

2.         The Chief Administrator, Punjab Urban Planing & Development Authority, Sector 68, Distt. SAS Nagar Mohali.

3.         The Estate Officer, Greater Mohali Development Authority, Sector 68, Distt. S.A.S. Nagar Mohali.

                                                                                    –          Opposite Parties

 

Present:           Sh.Nachhatter Singh Bains, Advocate for Complainant.

                                                                                               

                                                            ORDER

 

                        The case is at preliminary stage.  The learned counsel for complainant has made statement that due to technical defect, he may kindly be allowed to withdraw the present complaint with liberty to file afresh. Accordingly, the complaint is allowed to be withdrawn without prejudice to the right of the complainant to file afresh, as permitted by law.

                        Copies of this order free of cost be supplied to the parties. The file be consigned.

 

 

22.12.2010                 (MADHU MUTNEJA)                                         (RAJINDER SINGH GILL)      

                                                                MEMBER                                                     PRESIDING   MEMBER             



MRS. MADHU MUTNEJA, MEMBER MR. RAJINDER SINGH GILL, PRESIDING MEMBER ,