Haryana

StateCommission

A/812/2015

AMBIKA ENTERPRISES - Complainant(s)

Versus

PRERNA PURI - Opp.Party(s)

ARVIND CHAUHAN

08 Mar 2016

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA.

 

 

First Appeal No.           812 of 2015

                                                Date of the Institution:           24.09.2015

                                                Date of Decision:-        08.03.2016

 

M/s Ambika Enterprises, SCO 42, Sector 11, Panchkula through its Proprietor Smt. Urmil Kaushal wife of late Sh. Kirat Kaushal.

                                      Appellant-Opposite Party No.1

Versus

 

1.      Miss Prerna Puri daughter of late Sh. Satish Paul Puri, r/o 61, NAC Manimajra, Chandigarh – 160101.

Respondent-Complainant

 

2.      M/s Gadget Care, SCO 106, Phase 3B2, Mohali (Punjab) – 160055.

Respondent-Opposite Party No.2

 

 

CORAM:    Hon’ble Mr. Justice Nawab Singh, President.

                   Mr. B.M. Bedi, Judicial Member.

                    Mr. Diwan Singh Chauhan, Member.

 

Present:-    Mr. Arvind Chauhan, Advocate for the appellant.

                   Ms. Shradha Puri, Authorized Representative of the respondent No.1

 

 

O R D E R

 

NAWAB SINGH J, (ORAL)

 

          M/s Ambika Enterprises-opposite party No.1 is in appeal against the order dated June 22^nd, 2015 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Panchkula (for short, ‘District Forum’) whereby it directed to refund an amount of Rs.14,000/-, that is price of the mobile handset, alongwith interest at the rate of 9% per annum and Rs.10,000/- as harassment to Prerna Puri-complainant.

2.      During the course of arguments, Shradha Puri has stated that she has received an amount of Rs.14,000/- and Rs.10,000/- from the appellant and has returned the mobile handset to Sh. Arvind Chauhan, Counsel for the appellant.  

3.      Since the amount has been paid to the complainant, learned counsel for the appellant has urged that this appeal be disposed of being infructuous.

4.      It is ordered accordingly.

5.      The statutory amount of Rs.12,000/- deposited at the time of filing the appeal be refunded to the appellant against proper receipt and identification in accordance with rules, after the expiry of period of appeal/revision, if any.

 

 

March 08th, 2016

Diwan Singh Chauhan Member

B.M.Bedi Judicial Member

Nawab Singh President

(U.K.)