Uttar Pradesh

StateCommission

A/2009/485

Pepsico - Complainant(s)

Versus

Prem Das Shiv Hare - Opp.Party(s)

Vikas Singh

20 Feb 2018

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UP
C-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010
 
First Appeal No. A/2009/485
( Date of Filing : 24 Mar 2009 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )
 
1. Pepsico
a
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Prem Das Shiv Hare
a
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Vijai Varma PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Raj Kamal Gupta MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
Dated : 20 Feb 2018
Final Order / Judgement

ORAL

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

U.P., Lucknow.

Appeal No. 485 of 2009

M/s Pepsico India Holdings Limited through

Director/Chairman, 3DLF Corporate Park,

5, Block Qutub Enclave, Phase III, Gurgaon

Haryana.                                                         ..Appellant.

Versus

1- Prem Das Shiv Hare s/o badri Prasad Shiv Hare,

    R/o Qasba Bharuwa Sumerpur, Pargana Sumerpur,

    Tehsil and District, Hamirpur.

2- Manoj Cold Drinks through its Proprietor,

     S/o Kalu Ram Gupta, R/o Sagar Road, Sumerpur,

     Tehsil and District Hamirpur.

3- Jugul Agencies through partners Jugul Kishor

     S/o Sri Jagdish Pathak and Raju alias Vinod

     Kumar s/o Sri Jagdish Pathak, R/o Sabzi Mandi

     Sumerpur, Tehsil and District Hamirpur.

                                                              ….Respondents.

Present:

Hon'ble Mr. Vijai Varma, Presiding Member.

Hon'ble Mr. Raj Kamal Gupta, Member.

Shri Rishi Kirti for the appellant.

None for the respondents. 

Date:  24.5.2018

ORDER

(Delivered by Sri Vijai Varma,  Member)

Case called out. Counsel for the appellant Shri Kumar Ayush has authorized Shri Rishi Kirti, Advocate to argue on his behalf. None for the respondent.

          Counsel for the appellant had earlier moved an application for withdrawing this appeal. The application was supported with an affidavit wherein it is mentioned that the appellant was directed to pay Rs.5000.00 by the District Consumer Forum on 19.2.2009 but now the appellant does not want to press the appeal and want to withdraw this appeal. Therefore, this appeal deserves to be dismissed as withdrawn.

          It is accordingly, dismissed.

Certified copy of the order be provided to the parties in accordance with rules.

 

            (Vijai Varma)                   (Raj Kamal Gupta)

         Presiding Member                       Member

Jafri PA II

Court No.4

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Vijai Varma]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MR. Raj Kamal Gupta]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.