Haryana

Karnal

CC/601/2022

Jasmer Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Preet Paradise, The Party Lawn And Other Functions - Opp.Party(s)

Narender Singh Cheema

11 Jun 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                          Complaint.No.601 of 2022

                                                          Date of instt.21.10.2022

                                                          Date of Decision:11.06.2024

 

Jasmer Singh son of Sh. Mohinder Singh R/o House No.429, Sector-7, Urban Estate, Karnal.

 

          ...…Complainant.

                                        Versus

1. Preet Paradise, The Party Lawn and other functions, Indri road, Karnal through its proprietor/partner.
2. Vimal Preet Singh son of Sh. Harcharan Singh.
3. Harcharan Singh son of unknown, both residents of House No.1016, Sector-13, Urban Estate, Karnal.
4. Mandeep Singh son of unknown.
5. Pankaj, Manager Preet Paradise, Marriage Palace, Indri road, Karnal.

                        ....Opposite parties.

  Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                Dr. Suman Singh………….Member.

               

Present:   None for the Complainant.

                Sh. Naveen Khetarpal, Proxy Counsel for the OP-1,2 & 3.

                OP-4 given up.

                Mohinder Saluja, Counsel for the OP-5.

                                                         

               Today the case is fixed for evidence of the complainant, subject to the second last opportunity. No evidence is present. Case called several times since morning but none has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. It is already 03:30 PM. No further wait is justified.

                   A careful perusal of the file reveals that in the present complaint, the written version has been filed by the OPs-1,2,3 & 5 on 14.02.2023. The complainant has availed several effective opportunities for leading his evidence but the complainant has failed to conclude the same. It appears that the complainant is no more interested to pursue the present complaint. Present complaint pertains to the year 2022.

                   Further adjournment for the same purpose would not be justified as it would amount to wastage of precious time of this Commission.

                   Hence, in view the above facts, the present complaint is hereby dismissed. However, complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Dated:11.06.2024.            

               President,

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

(Vineet Kaushik)   (Dr. Suman Singh) 

  Member                   Member