DATE OF FILING : 06-08-2014.
DATE OF S/R : 09-09-2014.
DATE OF FINAL ORDER : 21-05-2015.
1. Sri Pintu Manna,
son of late Banmali Manna,
residing at Village & P.O. Latibpur,
P.S. Uluberia, District Howrah.
2. Sri Panda Dhenki,
wife of Ashok Dhenki,
residing at Village & P.O. Jaduberia,
P.S. Uluberia, District – Howrah.
3. Smt. Minati Baral,
wife of Biswanath Baral,
residing at Village & P.O. Jaduberia, P.S. Uluberia,
District Howrah.
4. Smt. Mina Sharma,
daughter of Sri Haru Sharma,
residing at Village & P.O. Jaduberia, P.S. Uluberia,
District Howrah.
5. Haru Sharma,
son of Sankar Sharma,
residing at Village & P.O. Jaduberia, P.S. Uluberia,
District Howrah.
6. Smt. Pratima Sharma,
wife of Hari Sharma,
residing at Village & P.O. Jaduberia, P.S. Uluberia,
District Howrah.
7. Shri Purnendy Roy,
son of Bimal Roy,
residing at Village & P.O. Palpara, West Bauria, P.S. Uluberia,
District Howrah.
8. Smt. Pratima Das,
wife of Bachchu Das,
residing at Village & P.O. Jaduberia, P.S. Uluberia,
District Howrah.
9. Smt. Archana Mondal,
wife of Alok Mondal,
residing at Village & P.O. Jaduberia, P.S. Uluberia,
District Howrah.
10. Sk. Kalamdar Ali,
son of Sk. Sabed Ali,
residing at Village Brindabanpur, ( Sk Para ),
P.O. Brindabanpur, P.S. Uluberia,
District Howrah. …………….. ……..…..…………………... COMPLAINANTS.
Versus -
1. Prayag Infotech Hi Rise Ltd.,
having its registered office at
P 45, Bhupen Roy Road,
Kolkata 700034.
Prayag Infotech Hi Rise Ltd.,
having its Branch Office at Bagnan, P.S. Bagnan,
District Howrah.
3. Shri Basudeb Bagchi,
son of Narendra Nath Bagchi,
Managing Director,
Prayag Infotech Hi Rise Ltd.,
residing at 139C/21/1, Becharam Chatterjee Road,
Kolkata 700034.
4. Smt. Swapna Bagchi,
wife of Sri Basudeb Bagchi,
Managing Director,
Prayag Infotech Hi Rise Ltd.,
residing at 139/21/C, Becharam Chatterjee Road,
Kolkata 700034,
5. Smt. Papiya Manna,
wife of Sri Raju Manna,
Senior Developer,
Prayag Infotech Hi Rise Ltd.,
residing at village Bangnan, O.T. Road ( near B.D.O. Office ),
P.O. & P.S. Bagnan,
District Howrah,
PIN 711303….…….……..……………………………………………………………Opposite Parties.
P R E S E N T
Member In Charge : Smt. Jhumki Saha.
Member : Shri Subrata Sarker.
F I N A L O R D E R
Complainants, ten in numbers, by filing a petition U/S 12 of the C.P. Act, 1986 ( as amended up to date ) have prayed for a direction to be given upon the o.ps. to pay them the entire amount of fixed deposits scheme, monthly interest scheme and monthly recurring deposits scheme being Rs. 2,34,654/-, to pay an amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- in total as compensation for causing mental agony and harassment and litigation costs of Rs.10,000/- along with other orders as the Forum may deem fit and proper.
- Brief fact of the case is that complainants made investments in fixed deposits scheme, monthly interest scheme and monthly recurring deposits scheme issued by the o.ps., on different dates vide Annexures collectively. Their certificate nos. are as follows :
1. Sri Pintu Manna Recurring Deposit Certificate No. 6148280,
2. Sri Panda Dhenki Recurring Deposit Certificate No. 6279655,
3. Smt. Minati Baral Recurring Deposit Certificate No. 6279660,
4. Smt. Mina Sharma Recurring Deposit Certificate No. 5247786,
5. Haru Sharma Recurring Deposit Certificate No. 5247787,
6. Smt. Pratima Sharma Recurring Deposit Certificate No. 5247788,
7. Shri Purnendy Roy Recurring Deposit Certificate No. 5247789,
8. Smt. Pratima Das Recurring Deposit Certificate No. 5266362,
9. Smt. Archana Mondal Recurring Deposit Certificate No. 5341756,
10. Sk. Kalamdar Ali Recurring Deposit Certificate No. 5330512.
3. O.Ps. promised to pay the maturity amount of the Recurring Deposit on due dates. But it is alleged by the complainant that o.ps. have not paid the same. So they repeatedly went to the office of o.ps. but on different pleas they have returned the complainants without giving their maturity amount. It is stated by the complainants that with the matured amount of fixed deposits they are to run their livelihood, meet medical expenditure, children’s education etc. which are really at stake. So, finding no other alternative, complainants filed this instant petition praying for the aforesaid relief.
- Notices were served. They appeared and filed written version. Accordingly, case was heard on contest.
- Upon pleadings of both parties two points arose for determination :
i) Is there any deficiency in service on the part of the O.Ps. ?
- Whether the complainants are entitled to get any relief as prayed for ?
DECISION WITH REASONS :
- Both the points are taken up together for consideration. We have carefully gone through the written version filed by o.ps. and noted its contents. It is the specific plea taken by o.ps. that deposits of the different complainants have not yet matured also a civil Suit is pending before 5th Civil Judge ( Jr. Division ) at Alipore, having T.S. no. 11680/2013 for which o.ps. are unable to disburse the matured amount to any of its depositors vide Annexure A of the written version.To be precise, o.ps. have become totally handicapped with respect to making any payment to its investors.And on this very ground o.ps. are not in a position to disburse any amount to its investors.Here we take pause. O.ps. have not annexed any order of any higher authority showing that there is any kind of specific embargo on the payment of maturity amount and interest amount of the complainants. And in that title suit complainants of this petition have not been included asparties.Why they should be harassed like anything? As there is no specific order of any higher court o.ps. are very well in a position to make such payments. People invest their hard earned money in a reputed company to get the ultimate benefit at their need. If they cannot utilize their hard-earned money at their bare necessities what is the use of making an investment or savings? Sacrificing many present enjoyments involving monetary expenditure, people make an investment for all future needs. So entire spirit of making investment is getting frustrated.O.ps. have miserably failed to keep their promise which they made on the face of the Bond certificates issued by them in favour of complainants. For their own wrong doings, why complainants should suffer at all ?Accordingly, the plea taken by o.ps. is not at all tenable with respect to the non-payment of maturity values. complainants have lost their faith on O.Ps.O.ps. have adopted unfair trade practice,too,which certainly amounts to deficiency in service on their part which should not be allowed to be perpetuated for an indefinite period.And we are of the candid opinion that it is a fit case where the prayers of the complainants should be allowed. Points under consideration are accordingly decided.
Hence,
O R D E R E D
That the C. C. Case No. 439 of 2014 ( HDF 439 of 2014 ) be allowed on contest with costs against the O.Ps.
That the O.Ps. are directed jointly and severally to pay maturity amounts of all investments made by the complainants of this instant petition with respect to Recurring deposits. Schemes in question within one month from this order i.d., 9% p.a. interest shall be charged till actual payment.
The complainants do get an award Rs. 10,000/- as compensation and Rs. 2,000/- as litigation cost and o.ps. are directed to pay the same within one month from this order i.d. amount shall carry an interest @ 9% p.a. till actual payment
The complainants are at liberty to put the decree into execution after expiry of the appeal period.
Supply the copies of the order to the parties, as per rule.
DICTATED & CORRECTED
BY ME.
( Jhumki Saha )
Member In Charge, C.D.R.F.,Howrah.
