West Bengal

StateCommission

RP/69/2022

Salt Lake City Medical Centre(Unit of J .R.& M Banik Pvt. Ltd. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Prashant Modi - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Sugata Shankar Roy

11 Jan 2023

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
WEST BENGAL
11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087
 
Revision Petition No. RP/69/2022
( Date of Filing : 28 Jun 2022 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 27/05/2022 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/46/2022 of District Rajarhat)
 
1. Salt Lake City Medical Centre(Unit of J .R.& M Banik Pvt. Ltd.
DD- 10, Sector- 1, Salt Lake, P.S.- Bidhannagar North, Kolkata- 700 064.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Prashant Modi
S/o, Lt Binod Kr. Modi. Block- CL, 92, 2nd Floor, Salt Lake City, Sector- II, P.S.- Bidhannagar East, Kolkata- 700 091.
2. Dr. Soumyadeep Chakraborty
DD-10, Sector- I, Salt Lake City, P.S.- Bidhannagar East, Kolkata- 700 064.
3. Dr. Jayanta Mukherjee
DD-10, Sector- I, Salt Lake City, P.S.- Bidhannagar East, Kolkata- 700 064.
4. Dr. Debasish Lodh
DD-10, Sector- I, Salt Lake City, P.S.- Bidhannagar East, Kolkata- 700 064.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJIT MANDAL PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. SAMIKSHA BHATTACHARYA MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. SHYAMAL KUMAR GHOSH MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Mr. Sugata Shankar Roy, Advocate for the Petitioner 1
 Dr.Kunal Saha (Authorised Person), Advocate for the Respondent 1
 Abhik Kr.Das, Koyeli Mukherjee, Advocate for the Respondent 1
 Abhik kr Das,Koyeli Mukherjee,, Advocate for the Respondent 1
 Soumen Mondal,Subhrendu Halder, Advocate for the Respondent 1
Dated : 11 Jan 2023
Final Order / Judgement

SAMIKSHA BHATTACHARYA,  MEMBER 

The instant Revision Petition  has been filed u/s 47(1)(b), C.P. Act, 2019 by the Revisionist/OP No. 1 of the original complaint case questioning the propriety of order dated 27/05/2022 passed by the Ld. Additional  Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajarhat, (New Town) in CC/46/2022.

Ld. Advocate for the Revisionist  has submitted that he has failed to prepare  written version as part documents supplied  to him are not  at all legible. However, in the course of proceedings he has already  filed written version  though some of the pages with the  complaint  petition are illegible. OP No. 1/Revisionist has filed  a petition to that  effect before the Ld. Additional Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission,  Rajarhat and upon hearing both the sides and perusing the copies of  the  documents annexed with the complaint, the Ld. Additional Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission,  Rajarhat   has observed that only page Nos. 221,  247 and 164 are not so much legible.

Ld. Counsel for the Revisionist has submitted that except  three pages,  there are other  number of  pages which  are illegible, such as Page Nos.  161, 166, 168, 169, 171, 172, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 183, 187, 188, 191, 194, 204, 208, 211, 212, 214, 216, 217, 218, 220, 222, 225, 226 and 296.

Ld. District Commission has passed  the  order  with  direction to the Ld. Advocate for  the complainant for supplying the aforesaid three pages i.e.,  Page Nos. 221, 247 & 164 to the Ld.  Advocate of OP No. 1 and fixed the  date  for filing written version  by  OP No.  1. The OP No.  1 has already filed their  written version before the Ld. Additional Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission though  the number of pages which are  mentioned earlier are not  legible. The OP No. 1 is not in a position to give appropriate reply in the written version and, therefore, he craves leave before the Ld. Additional Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission  to amend the same, if necessary.

Ld. Advocate  appearing for the  Revisionist has submitted that the Ld. Additional Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has erred in observing in the  order dated 27.05.2022 that only Pages No. 221, 247 & 164 are no so much legible. The Ld. Commission has acted illegally and passed its order with material irregularity by  not   directing the complainant  to provide the typed copy  of  all pages,  in particular the above noted pages.

Hence, he has  further submitted that the Ld. Additional Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajarhat, ought to have considered the fact that the OP No. 1  is not in a position to submit  the written version relying  upon the illegible copies annexed with the complaint petition.  Hence, he  prays before  this Commission  to set aside/quash/modify the impugned order of the  Additional Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajarhat by allowing the instant  Revision Petition and direct the complainant to supply typed copy of all pages which are handwritten and/or  not legible and the limitation to  file the written version   can be considered up  to the date when all  handwritten  legible papers  would be  delivered by the complainant.

Authorized representative of the complainants has submitted that the complainant has possesses the same  copy   which are  annexed  with the petition of complaint. Ld. Advocate for the OPs  No. 2, 3 and 4  has also submitted  that they are also provided with the  illegible copies.

 Upon hearing the parties and on perusal of the record and scrutinizing  the pages which are  mentioned by the Revisionist  as  not legible we have observed that the Page Nos. 164, 166, 208, 211, 212, 214, 217, 221, 222, 225, 247 & 296 are not much legible.

In the result, the order passed by the Ld. Additional Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission should be modified. 
Therefore, the complainant is directed to file  the  best possible legible copies  of the above noted pages before the Ld. concerned Commission on 09.02.2023.

In view of above, the order dated 27th May, 2022 passed by Ld.  concerned Commission  be modified to the following extent:

The Ld. Advocate of  the complainant is directed to supply the aforesaid  12 pages to the Ld. Advocate of OP No. 1/Revisionist  on   09.02.2022.

 

Fix 09.02.2023 for appearance of the parties before the  concerned Commission and  for filing copy of  above noted pages by the complainant and for receiving further  direction from the Ld. Additional Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajarhat.

In view of above, the Revision Petition is  modified  on contest and disposed of accordingly.

Office is directed to send  a copy of this order to the Ld. Additional Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajarhat.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJIT MANDAL]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SAMIKSHA BHATTACHARYA]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SHYAMAL KUMAR GHOSH]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.