04.08.2021

ORDER

Mr. RAVISHANKAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER

1.        The appellant/Opposite Party filed this appeal way back in the year 2013 being aggrieved by the Order dt.28.05.2013 passed in CC.No.101/2011 on the file of Bangalore Urban District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bangalore wherein the District Commission allowed the complaint which directed the Opposite Party to refund Rs.86,400/- to the complainant with interest at 18% p.a. from the date of respective payments, till realization along with Rs.2,000/- towards costs of the litigation.

2.        The appellant not appeared before this Commission inspite of giving sufficient opportunities to address his arguments and to convince how the impugned order passed by the District Commission is not satisfactory and against to law. 

3.        The case called twice, appellant not present.

4.        We have perused the appeal memo.  Mere memorandum of appeal is not sufficient to hold the appeal in the absence of any arguments and convincement by the appellant.  As such, the appeal requires to be dismissed.  Accordingly, appeal is dismissed.

The amount in deposit shall be transmitted to the District Commission for disbursement of the same to the complainant.

Forward free copies to both parties.

             Sd/-                                                                   Sd/-

MEMBER                                                      JUDICIAL MEMBER

KCS*