Respondent first car met with an accident while it was being driven by Petitioner serviceman. Petitioner replaced the vehicle and gave a new car to the Respondents. Alleging manufacturing defects in the second unit the Respondent filed the complaint. District Forum partly allowed the complaint. It held that the question of replacement of the second unit did not arise as there was no manufacturing defects. However, District Forum directed the Petitioner to pay Rs. 44,000/- within 30 days. In default the amount was to carry interest @ 10%. Out of this Rs. 44,000/- Rs. 209,,000/- were given for the inconvenience suffered by the Complainant and Rs. 24,008/- towards the insurance of the first car. Petitioner being aggrieved filed an appeal before the State Commission. State Commission has upheld the order of the District Forum. Counsel for the Petitioner submits that he does not challenge the award of Rs. 20,000/- to the Respondents for the inconvenience suffered by him. The only point pressed by him was regarding the sum of Rs. 24008/- awarded by the fora below towards the insurance cover of the first car. We have impressed upon the Counsel for the Petitioner that the cost of litigation would be more that the sum of Rs. 24008/- involved in this case. Counsel for the Petitioner on reconsideration seeks to withdraw the revision petition and the same is dismissed as such.