Orissa

StateCommission

A/252/2014

Hassim Hossain Khan. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Post Master, Jaipur Road Post Office. - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Somanath Nanda

09 Jun 2023

ORDER

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
ODISHA, CUTTACK
 
First Appeal No. A/252/2014
( Date of Filing : 02 May 2014 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 21/03/2014 in Case No. CC/291/2012 of District Jajapur)
 
1. Hassim Hossain Khan.
S/o- Late B. Mohammad, Vill-Dala, Jajpur Road, Dist-Jajpur.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Post Master, Jaipur Road Post Office.
Jajpur Road, Dist-Jajpur.
2. Head Post Master,
jajpur Town Head Post Office, Jajpur.
3. Post Master, Head Post Office
Keonjhar
4. Superintendent of post Office
North Division, Cuttack.
5. Regional Transport, Authority.
Keonjhar.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Dr. D.P. Choudhury PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Pramode Kumar Prusty. MEMBER
 HON'BLE MS. Sudhiralaxmi Pattnaik MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Mr. Somanath Nanda, Advocate for the Appellant 1
 M/s. R.C. Swain & Assoc., Advocate for the Respondent 1
Dated : 09 Jun 2023
Final Order / Judgement

         Heard learned counsel for  both sides.

2.      Here is an appeal filedu/s 15 of the erstwhile Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter called the ‘Act’). Parties to these appeals shall be referred to with reference to their respective status before the learned District Forum.

3.      It is revealed from the pleadings of both the parties that the complainant has deposited the road tax of Rs.5,220/- for his vehicle bearing Registration Nos. OR-04-E-4849 and OR -09-6262  before the OPs – Post Office to  be paid to OP No.5  towards road tax but it was not paid to the RTO, Keonjharfor  renewal of fitness certificate. Complainant alleged that due to inaction of the OPs – Postal Department the fitness certificate could not be available for the year 2010. Complainant alleged that due to non-receipt of road tax the fitness certificate expired and on being approached  OP No.5 assured to renew the fitness certificate  with penalty towards road tax deposited. Accordingly, the complainant deposited the penalty amount and got the renewal of fitness certificate. Complainant also alleged about harassment and mental agony.  As due to inaction of OPs – Postal Department the complainant suffered as such,  he filed the complaint.

4.      OPs – Postal Department appeared and filed written version stating that they have already received the amount but in delay submitted before the RTO, Keonjhar who was issued the fitness certificate  after receiving Rs. 52,046/- and there is no deficiency in service on their part.

5.      After hearing both the parties, the learned District Forum passed the following order:-
                              “xxx     xxxxxx

In the result, the  disputeis allowed against OP no.1 and 3 as well as dismissed against OP no.2, 4 and 5. The OP no.1 and 3 are directed to pay compensation of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) to the petitioner within one month after receipt of this order, failing which the petitioner is at liberty to take shelter of this Fora for realization of the awarded amount. No cost.”

6.      Learned counsel for the appellant  who is complainant submitted that he has challenged the impugned order of the learned District Forum for enhancing the compensation amount. According to him he could not get the fitness certificate for two years due to latches of the OPs – Postal  Department. He also submitted that due to inaction of the OPs – Postal Department,  he has to pay the penalty and got mental agony. Therefore, adequate compensation should be paid to the complainant. So he submitted to modify the impugned order by enhancing the amount of compensation.

7.      Learned counsel for the respondents – Postal Department submitted that they have already complied the order of the learned District Forum. She supports the impugned order.

8.      Considered the submission of learned counsel for the   respective parties and perused the impugned order including the DFR.

9.      It is an admitted fact that  due to inaction of the OP – Postal  Department the amount was not deposited on time with OP No.5 and by that the complainant had to deposit the penalty. It is also admitted by the complainant that  the OPs have complied the impugned order. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the complainant that payment has been made on 6.4.2009 but the payment was in fact adjusted in 2010. It is submitted by  the learned counsel for the appellant that  in order to waive out the penalty, he has already taken recourse before the Hon’ble High Court of Orissa. But the necessarydocument has not been filed as to how much he has sustained loss. Since it is a case of deficiency in service on the part of the OPs – Postal Department for not depositing the amount on time, the amount of Rs.5,000/- alreadyhasbeen paid  admitting their fault to the complainant, we only allow the petition by awarding further Rs.5,000/- as litigation cost payable by the OPs – Postal Department to the complainant.

10.    In view of aforesaid discussion, we hereby allow the appeal in part by directing the OPs – Postal Department to pay further amount of Rs.5,000/- to the complainant towards litigation cost within a period of 45 days from today.

          DFR be sent back forthwith.

        Supply free copy of this order to the respective parties or the copy of this order be downloaded from Confonet or Website of this Commission to treat same as copy supplied from this Commission.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Dr. D.P. Choudhury]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Pramode Kumar Prusty.]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MS. Sudhiralaxmi Pattnaik]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.