NCDRC

NCDRC

FA/395/2013

DPH SOFTWARE SERVICES (P) LTD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

PORSCHE CENTRE, NEW DELHI & 6 ORS. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. SUMIT K. BATRA

09 Sep 2013

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
FIRST APPEAL NO. 395 OF 2013
 
(Against the Order dated 22/04/2013 in Complaint No. 439/2012 of the State Commission Delhi)
1. DPH SOFTWARE SERVICES (P) LTD.
III FLOOR, SANCHI BUILDING, NEHRU PLACE,
NEW DELHI-110063
...........Appellant(s)
Versus 
1. PORSCHE CENTRE, NEW DELHI & 6 ORS.
THROUGH MR. ASHISH CHORDIA, MANAGING DIRECTOR, 50-B, DIPLOMATIC ENCLAVE, CHANKYAPURI,
NEW DELHI-110021
2. MR. MANEESH RASEEN
MANAGER, SALES, PORSCHE CENTRE, NEW DELHI, 50-B, DIPLOMATIC ENCLAVE, CHANAKYAPURI
NEW DELHI-110021
3. DR. ING. H.E.F. PORSCHE AG,
PORSCHEPLATZ-1, D-70435 STUTTGART-ZUFFENHAUSEN.
GERMANY
4. MR. GEORGE WILLS,
MD PORSCHE, PORSCHE CENTRE DUBAI, AL NABOODA AUTOMOBILES LLC,
10773, DUBAI
5. MR. DETLEV VON PLATEN
980, HAMMOND DR., STE. 1000, ATLANTA GA-30328
USA
6. MR. MATTHIAS MILLER
980, HAMMOND DR., STE. 1000, ATLANTA GA-30328
USA
7. MR. BERNHARD MAIER
980, HAMMOND DR., STE. 1000, ATLANTA GA-30328
USA
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. VINEETA RAI, PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. VINAY KUMAR, MEMBER

For the Appellant :
Mr. Tarun Walia, Advocate
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 09 Sep 2013
ORDER

State Commission dismissed the complaint in default of appearance.  Limited notice was issued to the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned order be not set aside and the case remitted back to the State Commission for a fresh decision in accordance with law.

            Notices were sent to all the seven respondents by speed post on 31.07.2013.  Notices sent to respondents no.4 & 5 have been received back with the postal remarks ‘Returned To Sender’. Notices sent to other respondents have not been received back served or otherwise.  Since 30 days have lapsed since issuance of notices to the respondents, they would be deemed to have been served.

 

-3-

            For the reasons stated above, impugned order is set aside and the case is remitted back to the State Commission to decide it afresh in accordance with law.

            Parties through their counsel are directed to appear before the State Commission on 13.11.2013.

            Copy of this order be sent to the respondents with a direction to appear before the State Commission on the date fixed.

 

 

 
......................
VINEETA RAI
PRESIDING MEMBER
......................
VINAY KUMAR
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.