Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/16/2013

V. KANDASAMY - Complainant(s)

Versus

POPULAR VEHICLES AND SERVICES LTD., MANAGING DIRECTOR - Opp.Party(s)

R. SAMPATH KUMAR

08 Sep 2021

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
First Appeal No. FA/16/2013
( Date of Filing : 21 Jan 2013 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )
 
1. V. KANDASAMY
NO. 11, V.R.D. NAGAR, MADHAVARAM,CHENNAI-60
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. POPULAR VEHICLES AND SERVICES LTD., MANAGING DIRECTOR
MARUTHI TRUE VALUE, NO. 14, ARUNACHALAM ROAD, SALIGRAMAM,CHENNAI-93
2. THE SERVICE MANAGER
POPULAR VEHICLES AND SERVICES LTD.,MARUTHI TRUE VALUE, NO. 14, ARUNACHALAM ROAD, SALIGRAMAM,CHENNAI-93
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 08 Sep 2021
Final Order / Judgement

                            STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                   BEFORE   HON’BLE THIRU. JUSTICE. R. SUBBIAH                  ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                     Tmt.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                                   ::      MEMBER

 

FA. No. 16/2013

  (Against the order in C.C. No. 490/2008, dated 22.10.2012 on the file of the DCDRF, Chennai(South)

                                                             DATED THIS THE 3rd  DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021

 

V.Kandasamy,

S/o M.Velayudham

No.11, V.R.D.Nagar,

Madhavaram,

 Chennai – 600 060                                           ..Appellant/complainant

                                                     

                                                 Vs

 

1.M/s Popular Vehicles and Services Ltd,

Rep.by its Managing Director,

Maruthi True Value,

14, Arunachalam Road,

Saligramam, Chennai – 93      

 

2. The Service Manager,

M/s Popular vehicles and services Ltd,

Rep.by its Managing Director, 

14, Arunachalam Road,

Saligramam, Chennai – 93                                ..Respondents/opposite parties

 

Counsel for Appellant/complainant                : M/s Sampath Kumar

Respondents/ops 1 and 2                             : Served called absent

 

          This appeal coming on before us for hearing today, this Commission made the following order in open court :-

 

                                                                            Docket order

 

          No representation for Appellant. This appeal is posted today for appearance of appellant and for arguments in list. When this matter was called at 11.00 A.M, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence the matter was passed over and again called at 1.00 noon. But the appellant was again not present, hence the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. The appellant had not taken any efforts to appear. Hence the appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

 

       Sd/-                                                                                                            Sd/-

S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                                                                         R. SUBBIAH             

          MEMBER                                                                                             PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.