Kerala

StateCommission

A/73/2024

KAMALAM - Complainant(s)

Versus

POORAM FINSERVE PVT LTD - Opp.Party(s)

BHAGAVAT SINGH

03 Jun 2024

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
 
First Appeal No. A/73/2024
( Date of Filing : 03 Feb 2024 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 04/08/2023 in Case No. CC/03/2022 of District Palakkad)
 
1. KAMALAM
ANAMARI P O KOLLENKODE CHITTOOR TALUK PALAKKAD
2. SASIDHARAN R
ANAMARI P O KOLLENKODE CHITTOOR TALUK PALAKKAD
3. SUSEELA R
ANAMARI P O KOLLENKODE CHITTOOR TALUK PALAKKAD
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. POORAM FINSERVE PVT LTD
KOLLENGODE BRANCH PALAKKAD
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.K.SURENDRA MOHAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. SRI.AJITH KUMAR.D JUDICIAL MEMBER
  SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 03 Jun 2024
Final Order / Judgement

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

APPEAL No. 73/2024

JUDGMENT DATED: 03.06.2024

(Against the Order in C.C. 03/2022 of DCDRC, Palakkad)

PRESENT:

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. K. SURENDRA MOHAN     : PRESIDENT

SRI. AJITH KUMAR D.                                                    : JUDICIAL MEMBER

SRI. RADHAKRISHNAN K.R.                                        : MEMBER

APPELLANTS:

 

  1. Kamalam, Panangavu House, Anamari P.O., Kollenkode, Chittoor Taluk, Palakkad.

 

  1. Sasindran R., Panangavu House, Anamari P.O., Kollenkode, Chittoor Taluk, Palakkad.

 

  1. Susheela R., Panangavu House, Anamari P.O., Kollenkode, Chittoor Taluk, Palakkad.

 

  1. Gangadharan R., Panangavu House, Anamari P.O., Kollenkode, Chittoor Taluk, Palakkad.

 

 

                        (By Advs. Bhagavath Singh C.S. & Arya P.)

 

                                                Vs.

RESPONDENTS:

 

  1. Pooram Finserve Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Manager, Kollencode Branch, Palakkad.

 

              

  1. The Manager, Credit Department, Pooram Finserve Pvt. Ltd., 25/395/27, Pathayapura Building, Round South, Thrissur-680 001.

 

                  

 

JUDGMENT

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. K. SURENDRA MOHAN : PRESIDENT

 

          No representation for the appellant.  Service of notice to 1st respondent remains incomplete.  Though we had ordered issue of fresh notice to 1st respondent in the correct address, notice has not been gone for the reason that no steps have been taken.  It appears that the appellant is not serious in pursuing this matter.  Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

 

JUSTICE K. SURENDRA MOHAN  : PRESIDENT

 

                                    AJITH KUMAR  D. : JUDICIAL MEMBER                                                     

                                                                                                    RADHAKRISHNAN K.R.  : MEMBER  

jb

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.K.SURENDRA MOHAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SRI.AJITH KUMAR.D]
JUDICIAL MEMBER
 
 
[ SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.