Haryana

Panchkula

CC/105/2018

AMAR KAUR. - Complainant(s)

Versus

PNB METLIFE INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

MR.ANUJ KAUSHAL ,ADV FOR THE COMPLAINANT

27 Nov 2018

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA.                                     

Complaint Case No.

:

105 of 2018

Date of Institution

:

01.06.2018

Date of Decision

:

27.11.2018

 

 

 

 

 

Amar Kaur W/o Mr.Surjeet Singh, R/o House No.647, Sector-21, Panchkula, Haryana.

                                                                                          ….Complainant

Versus

1.   PNB MetLife India Insurance Co. Ltd., Unit No.101, First Floor Techniplex 1, Techniplex Complex, Off Veer Savarkar Flyover, S.V.Road, Goregaon (West), Mumbai-400062, Maharashtra.

2.   PNB MetLife India Insurance Co. Ltd., SCO 369, First Floor, Sector-8, Panchkula.

3.   Vinod Chaudhary, Insurance Agent (Code 3088680), PNB Metlife India Insurance Co. Ltd., SCO 369, First Floor, Sector-8, Panchkula.

4.   Pawan Singh, Insurance Agent (Code 99061483), PNB MetLife India Insurance Co. Ltd., SCO 369, Sector-8, Panchkula.

                                                                                                   ….Opposite Parties

COMPLAINT UNDER SEC. 12 OF THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986.

Before:        Mr.Satpal, President.    

                   Mr.Jagmohan Singh, Member.

                   Ms.Ruby Sharma, Member.

 

Present:       Mr.Gagandeep Singh, Adv., for the complainant.

                   Mr.Vaibhav Jain, Adv., for the Ops No.1 and 2.                             

 

                   Today the case is fixed for compromise. Cousnel for the complainant has filed his vakalatnama. Counsel for the Ops No.1 and 2 by making a separate statement states that the matter has been compromised between the parties and the OPs No.1 and 2 are ready to make the payment of Rs.50,000/- to the complainant in full and final settlement.

Counsel for the complainant also by making a separate statement states that he has read the statement given by the counsel for the Ops No.1 and 2 and agrees with the same, so, he withdraws the present complaint being fully satisfied.

                   Heard. In view of the statement made by both the parties, it is clear that matter has been compromised. Hence, the present complaint is hereby dismissed as withdrawn being fully satisfied. However, it is made clear that the Ops shall be bound by their statement made before this Forum today i.e. 27.11.2018 that the Ops No.1 and 2 will give the payment of Rs.50,000/- to the complainant. In case, the Ops No.1 and 2 fail to fulfill its commitment as per the above statement, the complainant shall be at liberty to invoke the jurisdiction of this Forum under section 25 and 27 of the C.P.Act, 1986.

                   A copy of this order be sent to the parties free of costs and file be consigned to record room after due compliance.

 

Dt.                        (Ruby Sharma)           (Jagmohan Singh)            (Satpal)

27.11.2018           Member                       Member                                President

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.