BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPTUES REDRESSAL FORUM, KAITHAL.
Complaint No.295 /2017.
Date of Instt:09.11.2017.
Date of Decision:06.12.2018.
Rakesh Seth s/o Shri Pawan Seth, r/o H.No.741, Ward No.7, near Hind Cinema, Kaithal. ……….Complainant.
Versus
- PNB Metlife India Insurance Co. Ltd., 4th Floor, Kunal Tower No.88, The Mall Road, Ludhiana.
- PNB Metlife India Insurance Co. Ltd., IInd Floor, SCO 223, Sector-12, Karnal.
- Vikash Dhiman, agent of PNB Metlife, r/o Dogran Gate, near Vishkarma School, Kaithal.
..……..Opposite Parties.
COMPLAINT UNDER SEC. 12 OF CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986.
Present: Shri Satish Sharma, Advocate for the complainant.
Shri Davinder Singh, Advocate of Opposite Parties No.1 & 2.
Shri Vikas Dhiman, Opposite Party No.3 in person.
Today the case is fixed for remaining arguments. However, ld. counsel for complainant got recorded his statement to the effect that due to technical grounds, he does not want to proceed with the present complaint further and withdraws the same. He further stated that he may be granted permission to file the fresh one before the competent Court of jurisdiction. Heard. In view of statement of ld. counsel for the complainant, the present complaint is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant is at liberty to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action in the Court of competent jurisdiction as per provisions of law and in that eventuality, complainant will be entitled to the benefit of Section 14(2) of Limitation Act and the time taken during the pendency of this complaint shall be exempted. File be consigned to record, after due compliance.
Announced:
Dt.06.12.2018.
Member. Presiding Member.
