West Bengal

StateCommission

RP/121/2012

The Eastern Tea Estates Ltd. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Pinnacle Honda, Chandrani Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Subrata Mondal

22 Mar 2013

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
WEST BENGAL
BHABANI BHAWAN (Gr. Floor),
31, Belvedere Road, Kolkata - 700027
 
RP No. 121 Of 2012
(Arisen out of Order Dated 14/05/2012 in Case No. CC/276/2011 of District Kolkata-I)
 
1. The Eastern Tea Estates Ltd.
Regd. Office - CF 366, Salt Lake City, Sector-1, P.S. Bidhan Nagar(N), Kolkata-700 064 & Br. Office- 1, Abdul Hamid Street, Gr.Floor, P.S. - Hare Street, Kolkata - 700 069.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Pinnacle Honda, Chandrani Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.
Chandrani Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., 230A, A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata - 700 020.
2. D.S. V. Surveyors Pvt. Ltd.
7, Red Cross Place, South Gate, 1st Floor, Room No. E1 & E2, P.S. - Hare Street, Kolkata - 700 001.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KALIDAS MUKHERJEE PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. SHANKAR COARI Member
 HON'BLE MRS. MRIDULA ROY MEMBER
 
For the Petitioner:Mr. Subrata Mondal , Advocate
For the Respondent:
ORDER

ORDER NO. 5 DT. 22.03.2013

HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. KALIDAS MUKHERJEE, PRESIDENT

Mr. Barun Prasad and Mr. S.K.Das, Ld. Advocates, appear on behalf of the Revision Petitioner.  None appears for the OPs.  Heard the Ld. Advocates appearing for the Revisionist.  This is an application praying for setting aside the impugned order dt. 14.5.12 passed by the Ld. DCDRF, Unit-I, Kolkata.  Ld. District Forum observed that in view of the judgement of the Hon’ble Apex Court published in (2011) 9 Supreme Court Cases 541 that Forum had no jurisdiction to recall its earlier order and thus rejected the petition.  It is submitted that the complaint case was dismissed for default on 3.4.12 and thereafter an application was filed for restoration of the case, which was dismissed, vide impugned Order No. 1 dt. 14.5.12.  We are of the considered view that the Ld. District Forum has rightly observed that it had no power to recall its earlier order and thereby to restore the complaint case to its original file and number.  There is no ground to interfere with the order impugned.  The Revision Petition is, therefore, dismissed and the same is disposed of.  The Revisionist is at liberty to file appropriate application before the appropriate forum, if not otherwise barred.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KALIDAS MUKHERJEE]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. SHANKAR COARI]
Member
 
[HON'BLE MRS. MRIDULA ROY]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.