Tamil Nadu

North Chennai

CC/128/2016

S.Thirumal Raj - Complainant(s)

Versus

Philips India Limted the Manager - Opp.Party(s)

V.Sathish

02 Aug 2017

ORDER

                                                                       Complaint presented on:  09.03.2016

                                                                          Order pronounced on:  02.08.2017

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (NORTH)

      2^nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3

 

       PRESENT: THIRU.K.JAYABALAN, B.Sc., B.L.,         PRESIDENT

                    THIRU. M.UYIRROLI KANNAN B.B.A., B.L.,      MEMBER – I

 

WEDNESDAY THE 02^nd   DAY OF AUGUST 2017

                                      C.C.NO.128/2016

 

S.Thirumlal Raj,

S/o. E.Sekar,

No.6/1, V.O.C.Nagar,

5^th Cross Street,

Anna Nagar East,

Chennai – 600 102.

                                                                                   ..... Complainant

 

                                     ..Vs..

 

 

1.The Managing Director,

Philips India Limited,

9^th Floor, DLF 9 – B,

DLF Cyber City,

Sector 25, DLF Phase – 3,

Gurgaon – 122 002.

 

2.The Manager,

Philips Electronics India Limited,

Temple Towers, 5^th Floor,

New No.672, Old Noo.476,

Anna Salai, Nandanam,

Chennai – 600 035.

 

 

3.The Manager,

Philips Electronics India Limited,

Sunny side, C Block, 3^rd Floor,

No.8/17, Shafee Mohammed Road,

2^nd Street, Greams Road,

Chennai – 600 006.

 

4.  The Manager,

Philips Electronics India Limited,

No.64/ 103, Commercial Plot No.3695,

3^rd Avenue, opp. To HDFC Bank,

Anna Nagar,

Chennai – 600 040.

 

 

                                                                           …..Opposite parties

 

                                                         

Date of complaint                                                : 26.08.2016

Counsel for complainant                           :M/s.V.Sathish, P.T.Geotom

 

Counsel for 1^st to 3^rd  Opposite Parties      : Ex – parte (10.01.2016)

 

Counsel for 4^th opposite party                            : Ex – parte (28.09.2016)

 

 

O R D E R

 

BY PRESIDENT THIRU. K.JAYABALAN B.Sc., B.L.,

The Complainant has not filed proof affidavit for the past 9 hearings. For the 10^th   consecutive hearing the case is posted today as last chance for filling proof affidavit of the Complainant. Neither the complainant nor his counsel have appeared today till 3.30 p.m and filed the proof affidavit of the complainant.

In spite of sufficient opportunity given to the Complainant to file his proof affidavit, he has not filed the same would show that he has no interest in prosecuting the Complaint. Hence no purpose would be served even if the case is adjourned and therefore we have decided to dismiss the Complaint for want of evidence of the Complainant and accordingly this Complaint is dismissed. No costs.   

                        Pronounced by us on this 02^th day of August 2017.

 

      -sd-                                                                                 -sd-     

MEMBER – I                                                                PRESIDENT