Delhi

New Delhi

CC/185/2018

Nitin Tyagi Nitin Tyagi - Complainant(s)

Versus

Philips India Limited - Opp.Party(s)

13 Sep 2019

ORDER

 

 

                              CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI

                                (DISTT. NEW DELHI),

                          ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN, I.P.ESTATE,

                                                               NEW DELHI-110001

 

       Case No.C.C./185/2018                                  Dated:

        In the matter of:

         Nitin Tyagi,

         S/o Sh. Devender Tyagi,

        Address - Chamber No.13,

        Patiala House,

        New  Delhi-110020.         

       …… Complainant

Versus

  1.   Vijay Sales,

      Delhi (Lajpat Nagar) BR,

      K-11/25, Central Market,

      Lajpat Nagar.

 

  1.    QSC DELHI,

c-152, Okhala Industrial Area Ph.I,

Near Cannon Building,

Okhala Phase-1.

 

  1. PHILIPS INDIA LTD.,

          8th Floor,dlf9-13

DLF Cyber City,

Sec.25, DLF Ph.3,

            Gurgaon-122002

 

  1. PHILIPS INDIA LTD.,
  2. 9th Floor, dlf 9-13,

DLF Cyber City,

Sec.25, DLF Ph.3,

          Gurgaon-122002

 

  1. PHILIPS INDIA LTD.,

24, Ashoka Estate 9th Floor,

Connaught Place,

New Delhi-01.

                ……. Opposite parties

 

 

NIPUR CHANDNA, MEMBER

ORDER

      

The complainant has filed the present complaint against the OP under section 12 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.  The brief facts as alleged in the complaint are that on 24.01.2016  the complainant purchased PHILIP LED TV  against Invoice No.302-DLJ01-16DNFWP 237, for a sum of Rs.45,000/- from OP-1.  In the month of February, 2018  the LED in question started creating problem such as volume was dead. As such the complainant make several calls to  OP-2 & 3  customer care number  but  they did not responsd to his complaint.  Thereafter, the complainant approached OP-1 and requested him to either repair or replace the LED  in question but OP-1 denied for replacement and repair of the said LED  and asked to contact  with OP-3 & 5.  The complainant  contacted to OP-5  telephonically and requested it to rectify the problem of his LED  but all in vain.  The complainant has also filed a complaint before Mediation Centre, Parliament Street for settlement issue, however despite service of dasti notice issued by Mediation Centre, OPs did not aspiration to appear before the Hon’ble  Mediation Centre. The non-repair of the LED in question by OPs amounts to deficiency in services, complainant, therefore, approached this Forum for redressal of his grievance.

2.     Notices were issued to all the OPs.  OP—1 & 2 appeared but   failed to file their written statement.  Thereafter, none appeared on behalf of  OPs, hence, they were ordered to be proceeded ex-parte vide order dated 20.11.2018. 

3.     Complainant has filed his evidence by way of affidavit.  

4.     We have heard argument advance at the Bar by the complainant and have perused the record.

5.     Complainant has placed on record the copy of Invoice dt. 24.1.2016, he has also placed on record the copy of the documents granting 5 years comprehensive warranty against the LED in question by OP-1.   

6.     From the un-rebutted testimony of the complainant and documents placed on record, we are convince that story put forth by complainant is true. Perusal of the complaint along with annexures shows that the complainant has paid an amount of Rs.45,000/- against the LED in question but he cannot enjoyed its fruit as being a defective one .Non-repairing or replacement of LED in question amounts to deficiency in services.  We, therefore, hold all the OPs guilty of deficiency in services and directed them as under:

i.      All the OPs are jointly and severally liable to replace the LED in question with new one  after receiving the LED in question within 30 days from today free of cost.

ii.      Pay to the complainant a sum of Rs.2,000/- as compensation on account of pain and mental agony suffered by him which will also include the cost of litigation.

 

Copy of the order may be forwarded to the parties to the case free of cost as statutorily required. The orders be uploaded on www.confonet.nic.in.

 

Announced in open Forum on 13/09/2019.

 

 

 

               (ARUN KUMAR ARYA)

                         PRESIDENT

                            (NIPUR CHANDNA)                                           (H M VYAS)

                                     MEMBER                                                        MEMBER

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.