Chandigarh

DF-II

CC/222/2012

Amarjit Singh Waraich - Complainant(s)

Versus

Pepsu Roadways Transport Corporation Chandigarh Depot - Opp.Party(s)

Sudhir Kumar & Harjinder Singh

13 Jul 2012

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 222 of 2012
1. Amarjit Singh WaraichR/o # 4080, Urban Estate Phase II, Patiala. ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Pepsu Roadways Transport Corporation Chandigarh Depot Near Tribune Chowk Chandigarh, through its Managing Director.2. Pepsu Roadwayay Transport Corporation Chandigarh Depot Near Tribune Chowk Chandigarh, through its General Manager..3. Bikram Jit Singh, No. CH151 driver of Bus No. PB-65-J-9959, Pepsu Roadways Transport Corporation Chandigarh Depot Near Tribune Chowk Chandigarh..4. Sh. Jagdeep Singh No. CH 139 conductor of Bus No. PB-65-J-9959, Pepsu Roadways Transport Corporation Chandigarh Depot Near Tribune Chowk, Chandigarh.. ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 13 Jul 2012
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM–II, U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

Consumer Complaint No.222 of 2012

 

 

Amarjit Singh Waraich      Vs.               PEPSU Roadways Transport                                                               Corporation & ors.

 

PRESENT:

 

None for Complainant.

Sh.Man Mohan, Counsel for OP No.1 & 2.

Sh.Bikram Jit Singh-OP No.3 in person.

Sh.Jagdeep Singh-OP No.4 in person.

 

Dated the 13th day of July, 2012

 

ORDER

 

 

            Sh.Man Mohan filed his vakalatnama on behalf of OP No.1 & 2.

            Called many times. Neither complainant is present in person nor any authorized agent has appeared on its behalf. So, the complaint is dismissed for default of appearance.

            Certified copy of this order be communicated to the parties free of cost.  After compliance file be consigned. 

 

                        Sd/-                                         Sd/-                             Sd/-

(JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU)       (LAKSHMAN SHARMA)           (MADHU MUTNEJA)

            MEMBER                                  PRESIDENT                                MEMBER

 


MRS. MADHU MUTNEJA, MEMBERHONABLE MR. LAKSHMAN SHARMA, PRESIDENT MR. JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU, MEMBER