Orissa

Baleshwar

CC/39/2017

Sri Ranjan Das, aged about 51 years - Complainant(s)

Versus

Peerless General Finance & Investment Co. Ltd., Kolkata - Opp.Party(s)

Sj. R.K Panda

29 Aug 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASORE
AT- KATCHERY HATA, NEAR COLLECTORATE, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/39/2017
( Date of Filing : 24 Jun 2017 )
 
1. Sri Ranjan Das, aged about 51 years
S/o. Bhajagobinda Das, At- Karada, P.O- Angeipal, P.S- Dhamnagar, Dist- Bhadrak. At Present- Fandi Chhak, P.O/P.S- Sahadevkhunta, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Peerless General Finance & Investment Co. Ltd., Kolkata
At- Peerless Bhawan 'III', ESPLANADE EAST, Kolkata-7000692.
West Bengal
2. Branch Manager, Peerless Gen. Fin. & Invt. Co. Ltd., Balasore Branch
At- Vivekananda Marg, P.S- Town, Dist- Balasore-756001.
Odisha
3. Chief General Manager, Reserve Bank of India, Kolkata
Department of Non-Banking Supervision, 15, Netaji Subhash Road, 5th Floor, Kolkata-700001.
West Bengal
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 29 Aug 2023
Final Order / Judgement

                                         The case record is posted today for hearing of the case. Neither the complainant nor his Advocate is present nor taken any step. Advocate for the Ops No.2 is absent, no step filed. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainant. Hence, hearing of the case could not be taken up.   

                                         In the present case, the Ops No.2 was appeared and filed his written version, whereas the notices against Ops No.1 & 3 were sufficient earlier. So, the Ops No.1 & 3 are set exparte. As it appears from the case record that the complainant remained absent since 10.12.2019 to till today, for which hearing of the case impaired and the valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. Considering the nature and conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the complainant should be dismissed.                     

                                         Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case. The interim order, if any, passed against the Ops is treated to be infructuous.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.