Delhi

StateCommission

FA/483/2014

IFFCO-TOKIO GIC. LTD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

PARVEEN - Opp.Party(s)

14 Jul 2014

ORDER

IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHI
Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
 
First Appeal No. FA/483/2014
(Arisen out of Order Dated 22/04/2014 in Case No. 889/13 of District North West)
 
1. IFFCO-TOKIO GIC. LTD.
OFFICE -34 5TH FLOOR AGARWAL MILLENIUM PLAZA NETAJI SUBHASH PLACE DELHI-110034
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. PARVEEN
R/O H.NO. 17 VILLAGE CHANDANPUR DABAS DELHI N-81
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

 

IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI

(Constituted under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)

 

           Date of decision: 14.07.2014

First Appal No. 483/2014

1. Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd.

    Through Its Branch Manager/ Chief Manager

    Office-34 Iffco House

    Nehru Place, New Delhi

 

2. Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd.

    Through It’s Branch Manager

    At 503, 5th Floor Agarwal Millenium Plaza

    Netaji Subhash Place Delhi-110034

   

                                                                                    ……Appellant

                                                         

VERSUS

   Parveen

   S/o, Sh. Daya Nand

   R/o H.NO. 17 Village Chandpur

   Dabas Delhi- 81….Claimant 

                                                                               …….Respondent

 

CORAM

Salma Noor, Member

N P Kaushik, Member (Judicial)

 

1. Whether reporters of local newspaper be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the reporter or not?

 

Salma Noor, Member

 

 

1)        In a complaint case bearing no. 899/13 Parveen Vs Iffco Tokio Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. filed before District Consumer Forum North-West, Shalimar Bagh, Delhi 22.04.2014 was fixed for filing WS by the OP/Appellant, but due to non-appearance, the Forum proceed ex-parte against OP/Appellant. Aggrieved by the ex-parte order of the District Forum the Appellant/OP filed this appeal.

2)        We have heard Counsel for the Appellant at the admission stage as there is no need to hear the Respondent.

3)     The version of the appellant OP for his non appearance on 22.04.2014 before the District Forum is that due to traffic jam he could not reach the Forum and the default occurred. To support his version he has filed an affidavit. There is no plausible reason not to rely and not to act upon this version of the Appellant. Besides, that it has never been the policy of law to stifle a contest and wherever possible, under the circumstances a lenient view in this regard has been recommended, so that the parties may have an opportunity to present their case before the Forum, so that the matter may be decided on merit. We therefore allow the appeal setting aside the ex-parte orders dated 22.04.2014 in question, subject to payment of costs of Rs. 2,000/- which the OP will pay to the Complainant on the next date. The case is remanded back to the District Consumer Forum North-West, Shalimar Bagh, Delhi with the direction that they will allow the Appellant/OP to file the WS and decide the case after hearing both the parties. The Appellant/OP is directed to appear before the District Consumer Forum- North-West, Shalimar Bagh, Delhi on the date fixed.

4)      A copy of this order be sent to District Consumer Forum, North-West, Shalimar Bagh, Delhi for information and to keep it on record and compliance.

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.